Object launched from a moving vehicle

  • Thread starter Thread starter claudio
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Vehicle
AI Thread Summary
In the discussed scenario, a baseball thrown forward from a moving truck at 60 mph would travel at 120 mph relative to a fixed observer on the ground, assuming no wind resistance. Conversely, if thrown backward, it would appear to drop straight down to an observer as the truck moves away, resulting in a speed of 0 mph relative to the ground. The conversation highlights that while classical physics suggests simple addition of speeds, relativity introduces minor discrepancies at high velocities, though these are negligible in everyday situations. The discussion emphasizes that the effects of quantum mechanics and measurement limitations are also minimal in this context. Overall, the physics of motion from a moving vehicle illustrates fundamental principles of speed and relativity.
claudio
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Got into a discussion today at work with a few co-workers about the physics involved in the below scenario, figured the only way for us to come to a better understanding was to ask someone with more extensive knowledge, so here goes,...

A flat bed truck is moving along at 60mph, a person is standing on the bed at the rear of the truck and throws a baseball forward ( the direction the truck is moving ) at 60 mph.

how fast is the ball moving?

I do understand that forces such as wind resistance factor in. Also that if the speed of the ball is measured from the moving vehicle then its speed is only as fast as its thrown. My question is from a fixed point such as the ground, does the speed of the truck add to the speed of the thrown ball.

please explain keeping in mind my physics knowledge is not as extensive as most of yours !
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If we ignore wind resistance... The ball ends up moving at 60 mph relative to the truck and 120 mph relative to the ground. Throw the ball backwards instead of forwards, and it would be moving at 60 mph (in the other direction) relative to the truck and at zero(!) mph relative to the ground- someone standing at the side of the road would see the ball dropping straight down while the truck zoomed away from it.
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BLuI118nhzc
 
If you factor in relativity, the velocities don't exactly add, but there are some diminishing returns as you approach the speed of light.
In particular, 60mph combined with 60mph gives 119.999999999905... mph.
For typical human scenarios, the discrepancy from the simple sum is extremely small.
 
Khashishi said:
If you factor in relativity, the velocities don't exactly add, but there are some diminishing returns as you approach the speed of light.
In particular, 60mph combined with 60mph gives 119.999999999905... mph.
For typical human scenarios, the discrepancy from the simple sum is extremely small.

Not only extremely small, but within the error predicted by quantum mechanics.
 
Whovian said:
Not only extremely small, but within the error predicted by quantum mechanics.

Also much smaller then our ability to measure either time or distance.
 
I'm adding this because I think it's an important point to make, too:

If the person on the truck were to just drop the ball then the ball would have a speed of 0mph relative to the truck and 60mph relative to the ground.
 
Back
Top