Object suspended over an empty bucket

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the effects of buoyancy on a scale reading when an iron rod is partially submerged in water versus when it is suspended in air over an empty bucket. Participants explore the implications of buoyant forces in different fluid mediums and the resulting scale readings in both scenarios.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant states that when the rod is submerged in water, the scale reading will increase due to the buoyant force exerted by the water on the rod, which in turn exerts a downward force on the water.
  • Another participant questions whether a similar increase in scale reading would occur if the rod is suspended in air over an empty bucket, noting that air also exerts a buoyant force but is less dense than water.
  • Some participants highlight the difference between the two scenarios, emphasizing that the bucket supports water while air does not support the bucket in the same way.
  • A later reply suggests that the scenarios are fundamentally different due to the nature of the fluids involved, indicating that the thought experiment should consider a bucket completely full of water before submerging the rod.
  • One participant concludes that if the bucket is full of water, there would be no change in the scale reading when the rod is introduced, as the buoyant force is balanced by the weight of the displaced water.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether the scale reading would change when the rod is suspended in air versus submerged in water. While some agree on the mechanics of buoyancy in water, there is no consensus on the effects of buoyancy in air.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss the implications of buoyancy in different fluids, but the discussion does not resolve the mathematical or conceptual nuances involved in comparing the two scenarios.

Tlaloc86
Messages
2
Reaction score
2
I was recently tutoring a first year student, and a question of her assignment was as follows:

Suppose that that you have a bucket of water over a scale. If you then partially submerge an iron rod in the water, while holding the rod so that it does not touches the bucket, will the reading on the scale change? The answer is that yes, the reading n the scale will increase. One possible explanation of this is that the water exerts a buoyant up force over the rod, and therefore the rod will exert a force down over the water, and this force will be registered in the scale.

I was then thinking what would happen in the same scenario, but this time the bucket is empty. After all, air is also a fluid, so it also exert a buoyant force on the rod. Will this also register on the scale? Of course if it does the increase will much smaller than in the previous case since air has much less density than water, but I'm curious if the effect will be there at all. The reason I think there may not be any increase here is that in the previous case we had two phases: water and air, whereas in this case we only have one phase: air, so the two scenarios are not completely analogous. Or maybe the water is "resting" over the bucket, while the air is not...

Anyway, just a rather silly question I cannot wrap my head around :) Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Tlaloc86 said:
The reason I think there may not be any increase here is that in the previous case we had two phases: water and air, whereas in this case we only have one phase: air, so the two scenarios are not completely analogous.
Right, the bucket is supporting the water, while it's not supporting the air. In fact, the air is supporting the bucket, if we want to consider the volume of the bucket walls.
 
Tlaloc86 said:
I was then thinking what would happen in the same scenario, but this time the bucket is empty. After all, air is also a fluid, so it also exert a buoyant force on the rod. Will this also register on the scale?
It's a trick question -- the scenarios are different because you set them up differently.

The bucket is half full of water. It is completely full of air. That makes all the difference. Try the thought experiment with a bucket that is completely full of water before you dip the iron rod in. Does the scale reading change now?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Tlaloc86
Tlaloc86 said:
If you then partially submerge an iron rod in the water, while holding the rod so that it does not touches the bucket, will the reading on the scale change? The answer is that yes, the reading n the scale will increase.
In order to answer your second question, it helps to answer the first question a little more fully. So, for the first scenario you have correctly indicated that the reading will increase. How much will it increase? Assume the density of the water is ##\rho_0##, the density of the rod is ##\rho_1##, the volume of the water is ##V_0##, and the volume of the submerged portion of the rod is ##V_1##, the total mass of the rod is ##M## and the mass of the bucket is ##m##, and assume that the experiment is carried out in vacuum
 
jbriggs444 said:
It's a trick question -- the scenarios are different because you set them up differently.

The bucket is half full of water. It is completely full of air. That makes all the difference. Try the thought experiment with a bucket that is completely full of water before you dip the iron rod in. Does the scale reading change now?

Thank you, I think this solves it. If the bucket is full of water there is no change of the scale (You have a reaction to the buoyant force pointing down, but that same weight of water leaves the bucket when you introduce the rod, so no net change in the balance). Thanks!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jbriggs444 and Dale

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
9K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
16
Views
12K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K