I Object suspended over an empty bucket

AI Thread Summary
When partially submerging an iron rod in water, the scale reading increases due to the buoyant force exerted by the water. In contrast, when the bucket is empty, the buoyant force from air is significantly weaker, leading to a negligible effect on the scale. The scenarios differ because water and air have different densities and properties; water supports the rod while air does not support the bucket in the same way. The thought experiment clarifies that when the bucket is full of water, the scale reading remains unchanged as the weight of the displaced water equals the weight of the rod. Understanding these principles highlights the importance of fluid density in buoyancy effects.
Tlaloc86
Messages
2
Reaction score
2
I was recently tutoring a first year student, and a question of her assignment was as follows:

Suppose that that you have a bucket of water over a scale. If you then partially submerge an iron rod in the water, while holding the rod so that it does not touches the bucket, will the reading on the scale change? The answer is that yes, the reading n the scale will increase. One possible explanation of this is that the water exerts a buoyant up force over the rod, and therefore the rod will exert a force down over the water, and this force will be registered in the scale.

I was then thinking what would happen in the same scenario, but this time the bucket is empty. After all, air is also a fluid, so it also exert a buoyant force on the rod. Will this also register on the scale? Of course if it does the increase will much smaller than in the previous case since air has much less density than water, but I'm curious if the effect will be there at all. The reason I think there may not be any increase here is that in the previous case we had two phases: water and air, whereas in this case we only have one phase: air, so the two scenarios are not completely analogous. Or maybe the water is "resting" over the bucket, while the air is not...

Anyway, just a rather silly question I cannot wrap my head around :) Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Tlaloc86 said:
The reason I think there may not be any increase here is that in the previous case we had two phases: water and air, whereas in this case we only have one phase: air, so the two scenarios are not completely analogous.
Right, the bucket is supporting the water, while it's not supporting the air. In fact, the air is supporting the bucket, if we want to consider the volume of the bucket walls.
 
Tlaloc86 said:
I was then thinking what would happen in the same scenario, but this time the bucket is empty. After all, air is also a fluid, so it also exert a buoyant force on the rod. Will this also register on the scale?
It's a trick question -- the scenarios are different because you set them up differently.

The bucket is half full of water. It is completely full of air. That makes all the difference. Try the thought experiment with a bucket that is completely full of water before you dip the iron rod in. Does the scale reading change now?
 
  • Like
Likes Tlaloc86
Tlaloc86 said:
If you then partially submerge an iron rod in the water, while holding the rod so that it does not touches the bucket, will the reading on the scale change? The answer is that yes, the reading n the scale will increase.
In order to answer your second question, it helps to answer the first question a little more fully. So, for the first scenario you have correctly indicated that the reading will increase. How much will it increase? Assume the density of the water is ##\rho_0##, the density of the rod is ##\rho_1##, the volume of the water is ##V_0##, and the volume of the submerged portion of the rod is ##V_1##, the total mass of the rod is ##M## and the mass of the bucket is ##m##, and assume that the experiment is carried out in vacuum
 
jbriggs444 said:
It's a trick question -- the scenarios are different because you set them up differently.

The bucket is half full of water. It is completely full of air. That makes all the difference. Try the thought experiment with a bucket that is completely full of water before you dip the iron rod in. Does the scale reading change now?

Thank you, I think this solves it. If the bucket is full of water there is no change of the scale (You have a reaction to the buoyant force pointing down, but that same weight of water leaves the bucket when you introduce the rod, so no net change in the balance). Thanks!
 
  • Like
Likes jbriggs444 and Dale
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Back
Top