Observation of gravitational wave strain.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the measurement of atomic strains using x-ray diffraction, revealing an annual sine wave that correlates with Earth's distance from the sun and the moon's position. The observed oscillation, approximately 10^-5, raises questions about the influence of gravitational waves, which are typically much weaker. The user has ruled out temperature effects and is exploring the gravitational impacts of the sun and moon on atomic strain measurements. They are also investigating how to predict results based on celestial positions and the implications of gravitational red-shift in relation to Bragg's law.

PREREQUISITES
  • X-ray diffraction techniques
  • Understanding of Bragg's law
  • Basic principles of gravitational waves
  • Knowledge of gravitational red-shift
NEXT STEPS
  • Research gravitational wave detection methods and their limitations
  • Explore advanced x-ray diffraction analysis techniques
  • Study the mathematical modeling of gravitational forces from celestial bodies
  • Investigate the effects of gravitational red-shift on measurement accuracy
USEFUL FOR

Researchers in experimental physics, materials scientists, and anyone involved in precision measurement techniques related to gravitational effects and atomic strains.

wipeoutscott
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello, I have a question or two about gravitational waves.

My current job is basically to measure atomic strains using x-ray diffraction. I have managed to reduce the error in measurement low enough to reveal an annual sine wave in my data for a sample which should not contain any strain. I first ruled out temperature as a cause, then noticed the oscillation is in good agreement with Earths distance from the sun. Further analysis has shown that the more minor oscillations trend very well with the azimuth and elevation of the moon at the time for a short enough period that the sun distance has not moved much.

The combination of gravitational effects from the sun and moon appear to be influencing the measured strain on the atomic scale. Searching on Google regarding gravity and strain has kept pointing me to gravitational waves.

The annual oscillation is on the order of 10^-5, from what I have found online gravitational waves should be many orders of magnitude weaker than this. However this seems too high to be a direct result of gravity, or am I wrong?

I would also like to use the sun/moon position at the time of measurement to predict my result. However I'm not sure how to superimpose the two effects, especially considering gravitational waves!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know details about your actual experiment or what you are measuring (my lack of knowledge), but I would be much more surprised to find out that you were measuring gravitation waves instead of the simple change in gravitation effect from the distance between the Earth and the moon/sun changing. Its pretty easy to determine the gravitational force (mathematically), and there are pretty exact values in terms of the difference in distance between the sun/moon at apogee and perigee, so I would crunch the numbers to predict the difference in force, and see if that lines up with experiment.
 
Thanks for your response Vorde. I've ran some simulations in Pro/e Mechanica and found the gravitational effects to be orders of magnitude smaller than the strains I am observing.
I'm starting to realize the strains I am observing are not due to the atomic spacing but very slight changes in the incident beam wavelengths (the other variable in Bragg's law). I've ran some basic numbers regarding gravitational red-shift that should occur from the sun's gravity and this is starting to make more sense.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K