Off center fed dipole input impedance vs height above ground

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the input impedance of an off-center fed dipole antenna at varying heights above ground. Participants explore the relationship between the impedance of this type of antenna and its height, comparing it to that of a standard dipole antenna. The conversation includes considerations of design parameters and practical applications in amateur radio.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • JR Richter questions whether the input impedance of an off-center fed dipole would change similarly to a standard dipole when varying heights above ground are considered.
  • Some participants suggest using simulation programs to model the antenna's behavior, noting the availability of free and paid software options.
  • JR Richter mentions that the off-center feed acts as an impedance transformer, implying that impedance variations might scale similarly to a regular dipole.
  • Another participant raises a question about the expected input impedance at a specific height for an off-center fed antenna, speculating on the potential increase in impedance.
  • There is a discussion about the practical implications of impedance matching for high-frequency operations, with differing views on its importance.
  • JR Richter provides anecdotal evidence of successful multiband usage of the antenna at various frequencies, suggesting that the design has been effective despite concerns about efficiency.
  • Concerns are raised about the voltage levels in high-power applications, with references to the implications of impedance matching on equipment costs and safety.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying opinions on the behavior of the off-center fed dipole's impedance in relation to height and design. There is no consensus on the exact nature of the impedance changes or the importance of accurate impedance matching in different contexts.

Contextual Notes

Limitations in the discussion include a lack of empirical data specific to off-center fed dipoles and the dependence on various assumptions regarding antenna height and ground conditions. The conversation reflects a range of experiences and theoretical considerations without definitive conclusions.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to amateur radio enthusiasts, antenna designers, and those studying electromagnetic theory, particularly in the context of antenna performance and impedance characteristics.

Jackson Richter
Messages
43
Reaction score
2
I have a question for the community. I am doing a further study and trying to locate any information regarding input impedance of an off center fed dipole at different heights above ground. A simple dipole targets 73.1 ohms for 1 wave length or higher above ground. I am not sure if the same would hold true for an off center fed dipole. For an example: If I designed my antenna for 3.6 MHz my half wave antenna would be around 134ft. If my input placement were at 90 ft from one end and 44 ft from the other, my calculated input impedance would be around 97 ohms. Would this impedance change be similar to that of a regular dipole? Any data on this would be appreciated.

JR Richter
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
There are very helpful free simulation programs for these types of antennas (usually posted by HAMs). Have you looked into downloading any of those? I can try to search for the sources if you need help. There are generally free program versions with limited resolution, and modestly priced versions with more features.
 
berkeman said:
There are very helpful free simulation programs for these types of antennas (usually posted by HAMs). Have you looked into downloading any of those? I can try to search for the sources if you need help. There are generally free program versions with limited resolution, and modestly priced versions with more features.
I have been searching for awhile now and have not used any of the antenna modeling software yet. I have a lot of data on regular dipoles but none on off center type. I realize that antenna's near field is the major cause of the impedance variations, but will it be the same for the off-center fed type? Any help here would be appreciated.
JR Richter
 
Jackson Richter said:
I have a question for the community. I am doing a further study and trying to locate any information regarding input impedance of an off center fed dipole at different heights above ground. A simple dipole targets 73.1 ohms for 1 wave length or higher above ground. I am not sure if the same would hold true for an off center fed dipole. For an example: If I designed my antenna for 3.6 MHz my half wave antenna would be around 134ft. If my input placement were at 90 ft from one end and 44 ft from the other, my calculated input impedance would be around 97 ohms. Would this impedance change be similar to that of a regular dipole? Any data on this would be appreciated.

JR Richter
The off-centre feed is effectively just an impedance transformer added to an ordinary dipole, so I would expect the result to simply scale up and down as for the normal case. By the way, may I mention that for a very low dipole over imperfect ground, the impedance rises above 73 Ohms, whereas over a sheet of copper it is less than 73 Ohms. I am not sure why accurate impedance matching is of great concern for HF operation, where feeder losses can be made very small.
 
If that's the case, then what would be the input impedance at .35 wavelengths high of an ocf antenna? If a normal center-fed dipole's input impedance (73.1 ohms)would rise close to 100 ohms (3.6 MHz) then would an off-center fed input impedance of 97 ohms rise 30 ohms higher or in this case to 127 ohms?
In reference to your question, this antenna has been used now with good results on multiple bands. It has been used successfully 3.6 MHz, 7.2 MHz, 14.4 MHz, 18 MHz, 25.5 MHz, 28.8 MHz, 36 MHz and 39 MHz. When plotting input impedance vs different feed locations you will see that the data shows that if the feed point is located at the 33.3% from the end of a normalized dipole @ 3.6 MHz, a multiband usage can be obtained with a current balun of (4:1) put at that point. I know this antenna is not the most efficient but working on that now to see If I can make it better.
Thanks JR Richter
 
tech99 said:
I am not sure why accurate impedance matching is of great concern for HF operation,
I think it's to limit the peak volts on the output valve and the feeder plus insulators. They can be pretty fearsome for a 100kW Transmitter say 300Ω feeder (>50kV RMS with a SWR of 1, even). But I only know about Broadcast stuff, not Amateur systems.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: tech99
Thanks Sophie for the input but this antenna is fed at pretty much a lower impedance point, making it a high current and lower voltage input. When fed with a (4:1 ) current balun a fairly good match can be obtained with feed point impedance of 200 ohms at the antenna terminals and 50 ohm impedance at the feed line. The max power is only 1500 watts PEP.
 
Jackson Richter said:
Thanks Sophie for the input but this antenna is fed at pretty much a lower impedance point, making it a high current and lower voltage input. When fed with a (4:1 ) current balun a fairly good match can be obtained with feed point impedance of 200 ohms at the antenna terminals and 50 ohm impedance at the feed line. The max power is only 1500 watts PEP.
My comment applies whatever Power Device is being used. (Amateurs are just as cost conscious as Broadcasters). No one wants to spend money on a device that can handle an extra 50% of volts / current when the correct matching will allow a cheaper one to be used.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
11K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
10K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
9K
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
21
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K