Okay, so this is probably very easy, just checking the solution

  • Thread starter Thread starter Adama0905
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The problem involves two crates with masses of 640 kg and 490 kg connected by a massless spring with a spring constant of 8.1 kN/m. When the spring compresses by 5.1 cm, the applied force can be calculated using Hooke's Law, Fspring = -k*x. The correct calculation is F = 8.1 kN/m * 0.051 m, resulting in an applied force of 0.4131 kN. The masses of the crates do not affect the calculation of the spring force in this scenario.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hooke's Law
  • Basic knowledge of force and mass concepts
  • Familiarity with unit conversions (kN to N)
  • Ability to perform calculations involving spring constants
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of mass on force calculations in dynamic systems
  • Learn about energy conservation in spring systems
  • Explore advanced applications of Hooke's Law in engineering
  • Investigate frictionless motion and its effects on connected systems
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics or engineering courses, particularly those studying mechanics and dynamics, as well as anyone interested in understanding the principles of spring forces and mass interactions.

Adama0905
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Okay guys, I'm new here, and this problem just annoyed me because I believe it's very simple, but it looks like it could be more complicated.

Two large crates, with masses 640 kg and 490 kg, are connected by a stiff, massless spring (k=8.1 kN/m) and propelled along an essentially frictionless, level factory floor by a force applied horizontally to the more massive crate. If the spring compresses 5.1 cm from its equilibrium length, what is the applied force?


Homework Equations



I think it's just this one: Fspring = -k*x


The Attempt at a Solution



Okay, the only thing that makes it sound at all complicated is that the crates are different masses, and that they talk about mass at all. But I want to say it's just 8.1*(.051) to get kN. Is that it? Or should I take into account the masses of the boxes. In which case I'm not quite sure where to go.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks like you got it.
 

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
45K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
9
Views
3K