On the direction of particles in a tokomak

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter bwana
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Direction Particles
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of particles in a tokomak, focusing on the mechanisms of plasma confinement, the role of magnetic fields, and the nature of plasma flow versus plasma current. Participants explore the dynamics of charged particles in a magnetic field and the implications for plasma stability and motion.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that the plasma in a tokomak circulates due to the sequential activation of donut-shaped magnets, comparing it to a mechanical analogy of liquid movement in a tube.
  • Another participant clarifies that the toroidal magnetic field exists before the plasma is introduced and that the plasma current is induced by other coils, emphasizing that particles initially move due to thermal energy.
  • A participant questions the concept of 'global' current flow, seeking clarification on whether it refers to net flow, which they assume to be zero due to opposing directions of cations and anions.
  • Another participant confirms that the induced plasma current is the only contribution that results in net flow, distinguishing it from the bulk motion of the plasma.
  • One participant emphasizes the distinction between plasma flow (net motion of the bulk plasma) and plasma current (the difference between ion and electron flows), noting that these can exist independently.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between plasma flow and plasma current, with some clarifying the distinction while others seek to understand the implications of these concepts. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the precise dynamics of particle motion and the definitions of flow and current.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the assumptions made about the behavior of charged particles in magnetic fields, and the discussion includes unresolved questions about the definitions and implications of plasma flow versus plasma current.

bwana
Messages
82
Reaction score
2
in simpleton's terms, a tokomak magnetically confines a circulating plasma. I assume the plasma circulates for the same reason that electric current flows in the presence of a changing magnetic field. By looking at the design of a tokomak, I would guess the donut magnets are activated sequentially. Activating one magnet just as the adjacent is reaching peak field strength would propel the particles around. A rough mechanical analogy might be a larger circular rubber tube filled with liquid. Sliding a narrow donut around the tube will propel the water around(although causes of motion are entirely different)

But to get to plasma, the gas has to be heated first. But once the gas ionizes, the negative and positive particles have to go in opposite directions because the same magnetic field will push the differently charged particles in opposite directions, right? Or am I fundamentally misunderstanding how electricity is generated?

I am ignoring the field generated by ion currents because the opposite current flows would cancel them out. So are there two opposing current flows in a tokomak?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The toroidal field is there before the plasma comes - it wouldn't work without. The plasma current along the ring is induced by other coils later. Without it, particles would circle around the field lines which follow the ring geometry, with the motion just coming from their thermal energy. The ring current is needed to get the plasma stable for longer timescales but that is a higher-order effect.
bwana said:
But to get to plasma, the gas has to be heated first. But once the gas ionizes, the negative and positive particles have to go in opposite directions because the same magnetic field will push the differently charged particles in opposite directions, right?
Their tiny circles around the magnetic field lines go in opposite directions, yes. This is not along the "ring" and it is not a global current flow!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
thank you for taking the time to reply. after searching a little bit i came across some drawing that showed the plasma flow 'spiraling' in helical fashion as it circled around the tokomak. following the lines of a giant 'slinky' stretched out inside the tokomak. i do not understand what you mean by 'global' current flow. do you mean net flow? I would assume net flow is zero since the cations and anions are going in opposite directions.
 
bwana said:
thank you for taking the time to reply. after searching a little bit i came across some drawing that showed the plasma flow 'spiraling' in helical fashion as it circled around the tokomak.
Right, this is the induced plasma current, and the only contribution that gives a net flow.
 
We need to be really careful. The plasma flow and plasma current are two different things. Flow is the net motion of the bulk plasma. Current is the difference between the ion and electron flows. In general the current and plasma flow are two independent quantites. You can have a current flowing in a stationary plasma. You can also have a flowing plasma with zero current.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
900
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
986
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K