On the Validity of Swapping Dummy Indices in Tensor Manipulation

Wannabe Physicist
Messages
17
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
Using property (a), show that a symmetric tensor ##T_{i_1 i_2 }## remains symmetric under all rotations.
Relevant Equations
(1) Transformation law under rotation: ##T_{i_1 i_2 }' = r_{i_1 j_1} r_{i_2 j_2} T_{j_1 j_2}##
(2) Definition of symmetric tensor: ##T_{i_1 i_2} - T_{i_2 i_1} = 0##
Property (a) simply states that a second rank tensor that vanishes in one frame vanishes in all frames related by rotations.

I am supposed to prove: ##T_{i_1 i_2} - T_{i_2 i_1} = 0 \implies T_{i_1 i_2}' - T_{i_2 i_1}' = 0##

Here's my solution. Consider,

$$T_{i_1 i_2}' - T_{i_2 i_1}' = r_{i_1 j_1} r_{i_2 j_2} T_{j_1 j_2} - r_{i_2 j_1} r_{i_1 j_2} T_{j_1 j_2}$$

**Now consider this statement:** Because ##j_1## and ##j_2## are dummy indices and both are summed from 1 to 3, we can swap these indices exclusively for the second term in the above expression.

If I assume the above statement it is easy to obtain

$$T_{i_1 i_2}' - T_{i_2 i_1}' = r_{i_1 j_1} r_{i_2 j_2} T_{j_1 j_2} - r_{i_2 j_2} r_{i_1 j_1} T_{j_2 j_1}$$
$$T_{i_1 i_2}' - T_{i_2 i_1}' = r_{i_1 j_1} r_{i_2 j_2} [T_{j_1 j_2} - T_{j_2 j_1}]$$And then using property (a), I can prove the required statement.

But I am not sure if the statement of swapping indices is valid.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Wannabe Physicist said:
Homework Statement:: Using property (a), show that a symmetric tensor ##T_{i_1 i_2 }## remains symmetric under all rotations.
Relevant Equations:: (1) Transformation law under rotation: ##T_{i_1 i_2 }' = r_{i_1 j_1} r_{i_2 j_2} T_{j_1 j_2}##
(2) Definition of symmetric tensor: ##T_{i_1 i_2} - T_{i_2 i_1} = 0##

But I am not sure if the statement of swapping indices is valid.
It simply says obviously
\sum_{i=1}^n A_i B_i=\sum_{j=1}^n A_j B_j=\sum_{\gamma=1}^n A_\gamma B_\gamma
where ##\gamma=\{a,b,c,...,\alpha,\beta,...,\xi,\eta,\zeta,...\}## any symbol you like.
 
Oh right! Thanks a lot!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top