On the Validity of Swapping Dummy Indices in Tensor Manipulation

Wannabe Physicist
Messages
17
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
Using property (a), show that a symmetric tensor ##T_{i_1 i_2 }## remains symmetric under all rotations.
Relevant Equations
(1) Transformation law under rotation: ##T_{i_1 i_2 }' = r_{i_1 j_1} r_{i_2 j_2} T_{j_1 j_2}##
(2) Definition of symmetric tensor: ##T_{i_1 i_2} - T_{i_2 i_1} = 0##
Property (a) simply states that a second rank tensor that vanishes in one frame vanishes in all frames related by rotations.

I am supposed to prove: ##T_{i_1 i_2} - T_{i_2 i_1} = 0 \implies T_{i_1 i_2}' - T_{i_2 i_1}' = 0##

Here's my solution. Consider,

$$T_{i_1 i_2}' - T_{i_2 i_1}' = r_{i_1 j_1} r_{i_2 j_2} T_{j_1 j_2} - r_{i_2 j_1} r_{i_1 j_2} T_{j_1 j_2}$$

**Now consider this statement:** Because ##j_1## and ##j_2## are dummy indices and both are summed from 1 to 3, we can swap these indices exclusively for the second term in the above expression.

If I assume the above statement it is easy to obtain

$$T_{i_1 i_2}' - T_{i_2 i_1}' = r_{i_1 j_1} r_{i_2 j_2} T_{j_1 j_2} - r_{i_2 j_2} r_{i_1 j_1} T_{j_2 j_1}$$
$$T_{i_1 i_2}' - T_{i_2 i_1}' = r_{i_1 j_1} r_{i_2 j_2} [T_{j_1 j_2} - T_{j_2 j_1}]$$And then using property (a), I can prove the required statement.

But I am not sure if the statement of swapping indices is valid.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Wannabe Physicist said:
Homework Statement:: Using property (a), show that a symmetric tensor ##T_{i_1 i_2 }## remains symmetric under all rotations.
Relevant Equations:: (1) Transformation law under rotation: ##T_{i_1 i_2 }' = r_{i_1 j_1} r_{i_2 j_2} T_{j_1 j_2}##
(2) Definition of symmetric tensor: ##T_{i_1 i_2} - T_{i_2 i_1} = 0##

But I am not sure if the statement of swapping indices is valid.
It simply says obviously
\sum_{i=1}^n A_i B_i=\sum_{j=1}^n A_j B_j=\sum_{\gamma=1}^n A_\gamma B_\gamma
where ##\gamma=\{a,b,c,...,\alpha,\beta,...,\xi,\eta,\zeta,...\}## any symbol you like.
 
Oh right! Thanks a lot!
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top