One question regarding to the simple regression

  • Thread starter Thread starter liujx80
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Regression
liujx80
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
there are 3 variables. X,Y,Z.
Assuming
Y = a + b*X + errorTerm
Z = c + d*X + errorTerm,

Y = g + h*Z + errorTerm;

what can we say about the relationtion between h and (b,d)? under what
condition so we can have "h = b/d"?

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If h, b and d represent the actual parameter values then clearly you have:
Y = a + b*X + errorTermxy
Z = c + d*X + errorTermxz,

Y = g + h*(c + d*X + errorTermxy) + errorTermxz;
whence:
g = a - h*c
h = b/d
errorTermzy = h*errorTermxy + errorTermxz
But perhaps you mean b, d and h to be the estimated parameters. That gets more subtle.
 
Hey liujx80 and welcome to the forums.

Following on from haruspex's post above, are you trying to estimate them or do you know them already? If you are estimating them, do you have a specific distribution or analysis in mind? Do you have priors?
 
Thanks guys. The parameters are all estimated. I don't have distributions in mind. In general cases, can I use h=b/d using estimates? How wrong it could be? I had the same steps with haruspex's. However I'm not sure we then can say all assumptions are met. As you guys pointed out, it depends on estimations, which I have no clue .

Thanks
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top