Opamp RC-circuit -- Capacitor time constant calculation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the time constant (τ) for an op-amp RC circuit, specifically addressing the confusion regarding the inclusion of resistors in the time constant calculation. The time constant is defined as τ = R * C, where R is the resistance through which the capacitor discharges. The consensus is that the 10KΩ resistor is excluded from the calculation because the negative input of the ideal op-amp acts as a virtual ground, effectively shorting it out and preventing any influence on the discharge current.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of op-amp behavior, particularly ideal op-amps
  • Knowledge of RC circuit time constant calculations
  • Familiarity with virtual ground concepts in feedback circuits
  • Basic principles of Thevenin's theorem
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of ideal op-amps and their applications in circuits
  • Learn about time constant calculations in more complex RC circuits
  • Explore virtual ground concepts in feedback systems
  • Review Thevenin's theorem and its implications in circuit analysis
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineering students, circuit designers, and anyone involved in analyzing op-amp circuits and RC time constant calculations.

Abdulwahab Hajar
Messages
56
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


for the opamp circuit give in the figure, find Vo(t) for t > 0
the figure is attached.

Homework Equations


I know that tau = R * C
that is the time constant of a capacitor discharging is equal to the product of the resistor that it discharges through and its capacitance.

The Attempt at a Solution


The solution is in the file attached, I understand the whole thing. However, when I calculate the time constant my intuition tells me that the capactior discharges through the 100KΩ, the 20KΩ and the 10KΩ resistors. But the solution tells us that the 10KΩ resistor isn't included in the calculation of the time constant.
My question is why?

Thanks for the help
 

Attachments

  • abdos question.png
    abdos question.png
    37.7 KB · Views: 798
Physics news on Phys.org
Consider the properties of an ideal op-amp. In your circuit, what's the potential at the - input of the op-amp?
 
Yes, since it's an ideal op-amp the voltages of the - and + inputs of the opamps would be the same.
Therefore, the answer to your question would be: the voltage at the negative input would be 0V since the positive input is grounded and they must be equal.
But where does that lead me...?
Thank you sir, I really appreciate it
 
Abdulwahab Hajar said:
Yes, since it's an ideal op-amp the voltages of the - and + inputs of the opamps would be the same.
Therefore, the answer to your question would be: the voltage at the negative input would be 0V since the positive input is grounded and they must be equal.
But where does that lead me...?
Thank you sir, I really appreciate it
The feedback circuit "sees" the "-" terminal as a virtual ground (fixed at 0 V). Essentially it can't "see" anything past that connection, as it's effectively "shorted out" by the virtual ground.
 
But beyond that 0V there's a resistor of 10KΩ with 4V on the other end.
Doesn't that count for anything? I mean because a voltage difference exists shouldn't that incur a current somehow?
 
Abdulwahab Hajar said:
But beyond that 0V there's a resistor of 10KΩ with 4V on the other end.
Doesn't that count for anything? I mean because a voltage difference exists shouldn't that incur a current somehow?
That fixed 0 V means that the source current cannot be influenced in any way by what happens to the capacitor voltage. The feedback circuit only sees the (virtual) ground connection. Similarly, the input voltage source only sees the same virtual ground (hence the input current is fixed by voltage source and input resistor only).

Remember how when you want to determine the Thevenin resistance for a network you suppress fixed voltage sources by replacing them with a short circuit? The fixed input voltage at the - terminal becomes a short to ground.
 
Alright cool, I somehow got it
Thanks sir
 

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
43
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K