Open curcuit voltage of photovoltaic devices

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the open circuit voltage (Voc) of photovoltaic devices, particularly photodiodes. Participants explore the physical origins of Voc, the effects of illumination on voltage potential, and the relationship between Voc and dark current. The conversation includes theoretical considerations, energy band diagrams, and practical implications of photodiode behavior under different conditions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the origin of open circuit voltage in photodiodes, noting confusion about its absence in the dark despite the presence of a p-n junction or Schottky barrier.
  • Another participant explains that dark current only occurs under reverse bias conditions and that without applied voltage, there is no dark current.
  • There is a discussion about the behavior of an unbiased photodiode, with one participant asserting that Voc equals zero without light.
  • A participant proposes that illumination generates excess carriers, potentially shifting the Fermi level and creating Voc, while questioning the relationship between Voc and dark current.
  • Some participants reference external materials and papers on silicon photodiodes, discussing the graphical representation of I-V curves and their expected behavior under varying light conditions.
  • There is a debate about whether the Fermi level shifts with light illumination, with differing opinions on the constancy of Fermi levels in the context of built-in voltage.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the behavior of Voc in the absence of light and the implications of dark current. There is no consensus on the relationship between Fermi level shifts and the generation of Voc, indicating ongoing debate and exploration of the topic.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various theoretical models and empirical observations, but the discussion remains open-ended regarding the exact mechanisms and relationships involved in the behavior of photodiodes.

chenhon5
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
I have some questions about the open circuit voltage of the photodiodes. Physically, what is the origin of the open circuit voltage?

In the book "Physics of Solar cells": the open circuit voltage Voc defines the difference between the Fermi energies at which the total recombination rate in the cell is equal to the total generation rate given by the absorbed photocurrent.

However, what always confusing me is why there is no open circuit voltage of a photodiode when no light illuminate on the device, but actually there is a p-n junction or Schottky barrier (built in potential) exists. But when light is illuminates on the diode, we can measure the open circuit voltage. So how to determine the Voc in a band diagram and what is the theoretically limit of the Voc?

I appreciate any advice on it.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF chenhon5. I think you may be wondering about http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_current_(physics)" .
...dark current is the relatively small electric current that flows through a photosensitive devices such as a photomultiplier tube, photodiode, or charge-coupled device even when no photons are entering the device. It is referred to as reverse bias leakage current in non-optical devices and is present in all diodes.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If there are no electron holes being created by the presence of photons, then how will there be a voltage potential? If there was, then this would certainly violate conservation of energy.

I think where you are confused is with the dark current that dlgoff mentioned. Dark current only exists when the photodiode is in a reverse bias mode. That is when an external voltage potential is being applied to it. In a reverse bias mode, when there are no photons present (dark), there will be a small amount of current going through the photodiode which is why its called "dark current". If there is no voltage being applied across the diode then there will be no dark current.
 
I think chenhon's question is for an unbiased photodiode. What's Voc across a photodiode with nothing else connected to it.

chenhon5 said:
... what always confusing me is why there is no open circuit voltage of a photodiode when no light illuminate on the device

With no light on the photodiode, it behaves just as a normal diode would. So VOC=0.
 
Topher925 said:
If there are no electron holes being created by the presence of photons, then how will there be a voltage potential? If there was, then this would certainly violate conservation of energy.

I think where you are confused is with the dark current that dlgoff mentioned. Dark current only exists when the photodiode is in a reverse bias mode. That is when an external voltage potential is being applied to it. In a reverse bias mode, when there are no photons present (dark), there will be a small amount of current going through the photodiode which is why its called "dark current". If there is no voltage being applied across the diode then there will be no dark current.


Thank you for you two's reply.

It seems I did misunderstand something. Say we did not apply any bias and light on a Shottky barrier based photodiode, the work function of the metal and Fermi level of the semiconductor will align. So there is not any voltage potential (Voc) created. (I mix it up with the built-in potential.)

I try to understand it from the energy band diagram view:

But when the light illuminates, we got a open circuit voltage Voc, is that mean the Fermi level of the semiconductor shift in this condition?(difference between work function and Fermi level will be the Voc). To my understanding, the Fermi level may shift with illumination, since the light will generate excessive carriers, then the equlibrium condition will be broken and shift the Fermi level. Therefore the maximum Voc for a p-n photodiode is the bandgap Eg as said in some books.Is that right?

However I did not know what is relationship between the Voc and the dark current as you two mentioned. I did know the Voc=kT/q*log(1+Isc/Idark) Could you give more details. Thanks a lot.
 
I found these notes/paper on silicon photodiodes very well done. You will need Acrobat Reader to open the file.
http://www.optics.arizona.edu/Palmer/OPTI400/SuppDocs/UDTapp_notes_02.pdf"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
dlgoff said:
I found these notes/paper on silicon photodiodes very well done. You will need Acrobat Reader to open the file.
http://www.optics.arizona.edu/Palmer/OPTI400/SuppDocs/UDTapp_notes_02.pdf"

Thanks Don. Just wondering, what are people's opinions of the graph on p. 9, right-hand column?

My understanding is that the different curves should be displaced vertically from one another, rather than displaced diagonally (downward & rightward) as shown. How difficult can it be to enter the equation, shown above the graph, into some plotting software and show a more representative graph?

Regards,

Mark
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Redbelly98 said:
Thanks Don. Just wondering, what are people's opinions of the graph on p. 9, right-hand column?

My understanding is that the different curves should be displaced vertically from one another, rather than displaced diagonally (downward & rightward) as shown. How difficult can it be to enter the equation, shown above the graph, into some plotting software and show a more representative graph?

Regards,

Mark

Yes, I agree. The curves 9 show the IV curves with photoresponse with different light power density. As we know, the Isc is proportional to P (power density), however, the Voc is proportiaon to log(P), therefore...
 
dlgoff said:
I found these notes/paper on silicon photodiodes very well done. You will need Acrobat Reader to open the file.
http://www.optics.arizona.edu/Palmer/OPTI400/SuppDocs/UDTapp_notes_02.pdf"

Thanks a lot, Don. So do you agree that the Fermi level of semiconductor will be shifted with light illumination in order to generate the Voc?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10
chenhon5 said:
Thanks a lot, Don. So do you agree that the Fermi level of semiconductor will be shifted with light illumination in order to generate the Voc?
I'm not sure I would agree with this. From page 5 of the paper, they say that the built-in voltage is equal to the difference of the Fermi levels in the N and P-type regons. Wouldn't that mean the Fermi levels are constants? Not sure.
 
  • #11
Redbelly98 said:
Just wondering, what are people's opinions of the graph on p. 9, right-hand column?
It I-V curve should look more like this one:
http://www.rp-photonics.com/img/photodiode.png"
that I found in this thread:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=233453"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #12
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
20K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K