Open subsets above and below f(x), proving continuity of f(x)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving the continuity of a function f: R → R by analyzing the open subsets A and B, defined as A = {(x,y) ∈ R²: y < f(x)} and B = {(x,y) ∈ R²: y > f(x)}. It is established that if both A and B are open subsets of R², then f must be continuous. The user attempted a proof by contradiction, considering cases of discontinuity, but faced challenges with discontinuities of the second kind. Suggestions were made to assume the non-openness of A or B to further the proof.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of real-valued functions and their properties
  • Familiarity with the concepts of open sets in topology
  • Knowledge of continuity definitions in mathematical analysis
  • Experience with proof techniques, particularly proof by contradiction
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the definition and properties of open sets in R² topology
  • Learn about continuity and discontinuity types in real analysis
  • Explore advanced proof techniques in mathematical analysis
  • Investigate the implications of the Intermediate Value Theorem on function continuity
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, particularly those studying real analysis, and educators looking to deepen their understanding of function continuity and topology.

frito898
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let f:R-->R be a function. Define A={(x,y) \in R2: y<f(x)}, B={(x,y) \in R2: y>f(x)}, i.e A is the subset of R2 under the graph of f and B is the subset above the graph of f. Show that if A and B are open subsets of R2, then f is continuous


Homework Equations


N/A


The Attempt at a Solution


I tried to prove this by contradiction
Working under the assumption that f is discontinuous of the first kind
case 1: f(x-)=f(x+) \neq f(x)
Assume without loss of generality that f(x)>f(x-)=f(x+)
there is a f(x-)=f(x+)<y<f(x)
There is no neighborhood around y with a radius greater than zero that doesn't contain points above the function
Therefore, y is not an interior point of A
Therefore, A is not open.
Case 2: f(x-) \neq f(x+)
...

I have proven the cases of simple discontinuities, but I have no idea how to approach discontinuities of the second kind. I don't think contradiction even works, so I am back at square 1. Any ideas? Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
how about trying assuming A or B are not open, then there exists a point in A whose neighborhood contains a point of f or B
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
5K
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K