Opinions about the usefulness or otherwise of data synching services

  • Thread starter Thread starter sophiecentaur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Data Opinions
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the usefulness of data syncing services, particularly Apple's iCloud, and comparisons with other online backup solutions. Participants explore the functionality, limitations, and personal experiences with various services, including their applications for backup and file sharing.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express uncertainty about iCloud's capabilities, particularly regarding syncing and storage limitations, suggesting that it may not be suitable for regular computer backups.
  • One participant finds iCloud useful for seamless access to documents across devices, highlighting the integration with macOS as a significant advantage over other services.
  • Another participant challenges the idea that iCloud is effective for backups, noting limitations such as the inability to upload folders and the necessity of managing files in a cumbersome manner.
  • Some participants mention alternative services like Arq and Backblaze B2 for online backups, indicating a preference for these options over iCloud for backup purposes.
  • A participant shares a review of various online backup services, suggesting that iDrive may be a more cost-effective option compared to Backblaze B2, while also noting the need for further investigation into service suitability.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the effectiveness of iCloud for syncing and backup, with some finding it useful while others criticize its limitations. There is no consensus on the best service for data syncing and backup, as multiple competing views remain.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include varying interpretations of iCloud's functionality, the specific needs of users, and the potential for confusion regarding storage capacity and file management. Participants also mention the need for further research into alternative services.

sophiecentaur
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
30,374
Reaction score
7,466
Along with a lot of other people, I chose to use Apple iCloud without thinking too much about what it can do for me.
iCloud offers Synching and I pay £6 pm for 2TB of storage. iCloud gives synching on your boot drive and you can only use the remaining space with zip files.
But is Synch actually much use for regular computers? It will give access to loads of data to a smart phone with very little storage. I need educating about Synching; do you guys make use of it in any novel way that I could try?

I guess I should downsize to the minimum Apple package.
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
sophiecentaur said:
iCloud gives synching on your boot drive and you can only use the remaining space with zip files.
I'm not sure what you mean by this, but it doesn't sound right. iCloud storage is used for iCloud mail and iOS device backups, and optionally, messages, your photo and video library, and documents and desktop folders. Specific applications can use the storage to keep data to be shared across devices as well.

I use a Mac and find iCloud storage incredibly useful. Most of my documents and other files are in the cloud, so I can sit down with my laptop or at my desktop to work on stuff without the hassle of manually transferring data over or keeping track of various versions on that end up on different systems. When I'm setting up a new system, I don't have to restore from backup or transfer tons of data from the old system to the new. All I have to do is enable syncing, and most of setting up other than installing applications is done.

As for sharing documents, you can do the same with other syncing services, like Dropbox, Microsoft OneDrive, Google Drive, etc. Because I use Macs, iCloud beats the other services out because of the tighter integration with the OS and applications. If I used only one computer, I'd probably find it much less useful.

I used to use Dropbox until iCloud Drive got good enough. I use Google Drive with my work account. Instead of having students turn in work done on paper, I just share Google docs with them and they do the work in it.
 
vela said:
I'm not sure what you mean by this, but it doesn't sound right.
iCloud Drive won't allow uploading folders. That basically means they don't want all that storage capacity to be used for backup. And I couldn't keep putting stuff into the drive by drag n drop because I got messages saying the limit is the capacity of my 'boot drive'. I have nearly three times that amount of file space so how can I use it with iCloud?
vela said:
If I used only one computer, I'd probably find it much less useful.
Having read your post, I think this is the bottom line; you have put it into proportion in my mind - thanks. The entry level subscription will allow my emails and some other stuff (iPhone requirements). Also, iCloud is not good for backup because you have to do it with inconvenient folders.
 
I don't think Apple intends iCloud to be used for backing up your computers. For online backups, I use Arq to back up to Backblaze B2 cloud storage.
 
vela said:
I don't think Apple intends iCloud to be used for backing up your computers. For online backups, I use Arq to back up to Backblaze B2 cloud storage.
You are right; they don't intend us to use what we have bought (does a hard drive manufacturer do that trick?). They cleverly offer a cheap package that's just too small for most people and a bigger one that's not fully usable by many people (clever GB steps here)
The system seems to be designed to be underused. Firstly, we are told that the boot disc capacity is the usable capacity limit for synching then we are told that FOLDERS are not uploadable into my space that I paid for. To use the space I paid for, I need to break my stuff up into zippable chunks (with impeccable admin) and upload many GB at a time. That's not very helpful.

OK, there are alternatives but that doesn't excuse what looks to me like sharp practice. Dear old Time Machine works very well and the spare 1TB that's sitting unused in iCloud would do the job fine. Caveat emptor.
 
vela said:
For online backups, I use Arq to back up to Backblaze B2 cloud storage.
Thanks for mentioning Arq! I currently use CrashPlan. But Arq looks better priced - and the Premium version offers support for up to 5 computers! I'll investigate further. (I'm using Windows)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vela and sophiecentaur
Ars Technica published a review today of several online backup services. Their top choice, iDrive, offers 5 TB of storage for $80 a year. (I'm paying about the same for just over 1 TB of storage on Backblaze B2.) There's a deal for people with a .edu email address that cuts the price in half. The company is also currently running a promotion that cuts the cost for the first year to $8.

The review did seem a bit light on details, though, and only the Windows 10 client was tested. I'd take the review perhaps as a good starting point, but you'll need to investigate further to see if a service meets your needs.

https://arstechnica.com/information...m-top-cloud-backup-services-worth-your-money/
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K