Optics Newton’s ring apparatus Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter roam
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Optics Ring
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the calculation of the second wavelength in a Newton's ring apparatus, where the 11th bright ring of a 546 nm wavelength coincides with the 10th ring of another wavelength. The derived second wavelength is 603.5 nm, calculated using the formula for the radius of the mth bright ring, which is given as ##x = ((m-\frac{1}{2})\lambda R)^{1/2}##. The confusion arises from the differing definitions of the variable 'm' in the context of bright fringes, with some sources using "m-1/2" and others "m+1/2". The distinction in counting from zero or one significantly impacts the results.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's rings and interference patterns
  • Familiarity with wave optics and fringe formation
  • Knowledge of the formula for calculating the radius of bright fringes
  • Basic mathematical skills for manipulating equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the radius formula for Newton's rings
  • Learn about the conditions for maxima and minima in interference patterns
  • Explore the differences in definitions of 'm' in various optics textbooks
  • Investigate the impact of wavelength on fringe spacing in Newton's rings
USEFUL FOR

Students studying optics, particularly those focusing on wave interference, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to Newton's rings and fringe calculations.

roam
Messages
1,265
Reaction score
12

Homework Statement



Here is a worked problem:

A Newton’s ring apparatus is illuminated by light with two wavelength components. One of
these wavelengths is 546 nm. If the 11th bright ring of the 546 nm fringe coincides with the
10th ring of the other wavelength, what is the second wavelength? The spherical surface
has a radius of 1 m.

Solution:

Radius of mth bright ring is:

##x = ((m-\frac{1}{2})\lambda R)^{1/2}##

So

##(10.5 \times 546 \times 10^{-9} \times 1)^{1/2} = (9.5 \times \lambda \times 1)^{1/2}##

##\lambda = 603.5 \ nm##

I don't see why they've used "m-1/2" instead of "m+1/2"?

Homework Equations



According to my textbook the radius of mth bright fringe is:

##x = ((m+\frac{1}{2})\lambda R)^{1/2}##

Where R is the radius of curvature of the convex lens.

The Attempt at a Solution



My textbook always uses "m+1/2" whereas my lecture notes always use "m-1/2". I'm confused because id I use the first one I get an entirely different answer.

I would appreciate it if anyone could explain why we need to use the minus for this particular problem, and not the plus.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Could there be a difference in how m is defined like is the very first ring m=0 or is it m=1

that is do they start counting at ZERO or at ONE?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Thank you. I think if we start counting at ##m=0##, we should use ##m+\frac{1}{2}##. And if we count from ##m=1## then we should use ##m- \frac{1}{2}##.

BUT what if the problem asked for minima, instead of maxima?

I mean, the condition for minima is ##m \lambda##. Here do we count from m=0, or from m=1?? :confused:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
726
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
9K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K