Optimal study schedule for physics and math major

AI Thread Summary
The discussion emphasizes that there is no universally optimal study schedule, as effective study habits vary by individual. While some suggest a 30-minute study session followed by a 10-minute break, others argue that personal trial and error is crucial in finding what works best. Many students transitioning from high school to university may need to adapt their study techniques, as previous methods may not be effective in more demanding academic environments. The conversation highlights the importance of flexibility in study approaches, suggesting that focusing on the acquisition of knowledge rather than strict time management can lead to better outcomes. Additionally, taking breaks when struggling with material can help refresh the mind and reduce stress. Ultimately, individuals are encouraged to explore different strategies to discover their most effective study methods.
member 731016
I have read online that the optimal amount of time to study for is 30 minutes followed by a 10 minute break and repeat. Dose anybody else please know of a good study schedule?

Many thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ChiralSuperfields said:
I have read online that the optimal amount of time to study for is 30 minutes followed by a 10 minute break and repeat. Dose anybody else please know of a good study schedule?

Many thanks!

There is no optimal amount as a general answer. It all depends on you, your efforts, and your achievements. Here is an article about it from a professor in Michigan:

https://www.ams.org/publications/journals/notices/201707/rnoti-p718.pdf
 
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50 and member 731016
People tend to figure out what works for them through trial and error.

One thing you might find is that what worked well in high school doesn't necessarily carry over into undergraduate studies in university. Lots of students who excel in STEM studies at the high school level can do so through raw talent or innate ability and as a result they don't always develop strong study skills. So don't be afraid to shake things up if you're not happy with the results you're getting.

Try to make friends with others who have common goals. This will help you to identify pretty quickly what approaches are successful and which aren't. But as pointed out above, what works for other people may not work for you. Some people can sit for hours on end. Others need frequent breaks or they don't absorb the material as frequently. And when it comes to STEM subjects, much of the studying comes by working through problem sets, which doesn't always jive well with rigid timing schedules.
 
  • Like
Likes member 731016 and vela
I find the concept of studying for a "certain amount of time" often leads to very poor time management. Better to require (of oneself) aquisition of a certain amount of knowlege. This is far superior to "well I've studied for the required two hours,.....time for beer"
 
  • Like
Likes member 731016, symbolipoint, vela and 4 others
Somehow the advice of "don't be afraid to take a few minutes break every now and again" as morphed into some sort of rigid rule.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes member 731016, vela and Bystander
To the OP:

From my own experience, I've found that instead of focusing on studying for a fixed amount of time, and then taking breaks at a fixed amount of time (e.g. studying for 30 minutes, then take a 15 minute break), I try to take the approach of "how much time in the day can I meaningfully use to lead a healthy life (exercise, sleep, bathe, eat properly, cook, do daily chores, etc.), and how much time do I have left over to study?"

Once I have determined how much time I have left to study, then I devote that entire time to study and see how much I learn the material I'm studying. Some material takes less time for me to learn than others. But I devote my full attention during that time. That could be 30 minutes, it could be several hours, but I devote fully to it.

Also, if I find myself struggling to understand the material, or stumped on specific subjects, then I might take a few minutes break (perhaps step out, do something else) as a means of separating myself from the material. This would give me both the opportunity to refresh my mind, and separate myself from the material momentarily to give me the needed "space" away to not become too stressed. Then I go right back in and study the material.

Keep in mind, though, that my approach may not work for you or for others. You have to try and see what approach to studying works best for you in terms of learning the material.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes member 731016
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
I have a specialization in condensed matter physics and materials physics, and off-late, I have been seeing a lot of research directions moving towards quantum computing (AMO and non-linear optics) and the huge chunk of quantum materials research (and funding) is dedicated towards QIS and QC research. I am wondering (sort of in a dilemma), if I should consider switching my field? I am currently at the stage of a postdoc.

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Back
Top