Optimizing Multivariate Function with Constraint: Lagrange Multiplier Troubles?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on optimizing the multivariate function f(x, y, z) = x³ + y³ + z³ under the constraint g(x, y, z) = x² + y² + z² = 16 using the method of Lagrange multipliers. The key equations derived include ∇f = λ∇g, leading to the condition that x = y = z or cases where one variable is zero. The participant identifies a potential error in their solution process, noting that substituting x = y = 0 and z = 4 yields a greater function value, indicating the need to explore additional candidate solutions beyond symmetric cases.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of multivariable calculus, specifically Lagrange multipliers.
  • Familiarity with gradient vectors and their properties.
  • Knowledge of finding extrema of functions under constraints.
  • Ability to manipulate and solve polynomial equations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of Lagrange multipliers in detail, focusing on examples with multiple variables.
  • Learn how to identify and classify critical points in multivariable functions.
  • Explore the implications of constraints on optimization problems in calculus.
  • Investigate cases of constrained optimization with non-symmetric solutions.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying calculus and optimization techniques, as well as anyone tackling complex multivariable optimization problems.

Contingency
Messages
41
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find extrema for [itex]f\left( x,y,z \right) ={ x }^{ 3 }+{ y }^{ 3 }+{ z }^{ 3 }[/itex]
under the constraint [itex]g\left( x,y,z \right) ={ x }^{ 2 }+{ y }^{ 2 }+{ z }^{ 2 }=16[/itex]

Homework Equations


(1) [itex]\nabla f=\lambda \nabla g[/itex]
(2) [itex]g\left( x,y,z \right) ={ x }^{ 2 }+{ y }^{ 2 }+{ z }^{ 2 }=16[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution


(1)[itex]\Rightarrow \left( 3{ x }^{ 2 },3{ y }^{ 2 },3{ z }^{ 2 } \right) =\lambda \left( 2x,2y,2z \right)[/itex]⇔(3) [itex]x=y=z[/itex]
(3)→(2)[itex]\Rightarrow x=y=z=\pm \frac { 4 }{ \sqrt { 3 } }[/itex]
But subbing in x=y=0, z=4 gives a greater value..
What am I doing wrong?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Contingency said:

Homework Statement


Find extrema for [itex]f\left( x,y,z \right) ={ x }^{ 3 }+{ y }^{ 3 }+{ z }^{ 3 }[/itex]
under the constraint [itex]g\left( x,y,z \right) ={ x }^{ 2 }+{ y }^{ 2 }+{ z }^{ 2 }=16[/itex]


Homework Equations


(1) [itex]\nabla f=\lambda \nabla g[/itex]
(2) [itex]g\left( x,y,z \right) ={ x }^{ 2 }+{ y }^{ 2 }+{ z }^{ 2 }=16[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution


(1)[itex]\Rightarrow \left( 3{ x }^{ 2 },3{ y }^{ 2 },3{ z }^{ 2 } \right) =\lambda \left( 2x,2y,2z \right)[/itex]⇔(3) [itex]x=y=z[/itex]
(3)→(2)[itex]\Rightarrow x=y=z=\pm \frac { 4 }{ \sqrt { 3 } }[/itex]
But subbing in x=y=0, z=4 gives a greater value..
What am I doing wrong?

##f_{x}=\lambda g_{x} \longrightarrow \: 3x^2 = 2\lambda x,## so either ##x = 0## or ##3x = 2 \lambda##. Similarly for y and z. There are many, many candidate solutions, some of which are maxima, some of which are minima and (perhaps) some of which are constrained saddle points. Besides solutions with x = y = z you also have solutions with, for example, x = 0 and y = z ≠ 0.
 
All clear, thank you!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K