Optimizing Walkway Weight: Minimize 40x + 30y

  • Thread starter Thread starter chompysj
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Optimization
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves optimizing the layout of a walkway between two buildings, considering the weight of the walkway based on its orientation. The walkway's weight is determined by the lengths of its segments parallel and perpendicular to the street, leading to a weight equation of 40x + 30y, where x and y represent the lengths of the respective segments.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between x and y, suggesting the use of the Pythagorean theorem to express y in terms of x. There is confusion regarding the correct formulation of the derivative and its relevance to the optimization problem.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants attempting to clarify the application of differentiation in the context of the problem. Some guidance has been provided regarding the use of the chain rule and the need to differentiate the weight equation, but there is still uncertainty about the correct approach and calculations.

Contextual Notes

Participants express confusion about the optimization process and the application of calculus concepts, particularly the chain rule and differentiation. There is a lack of consensus on the correct derivative and its implications for solving the problem.

chompysj
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


You're building a walkway from the corner of one building to the corner of another building. The diagram looks like this.
85wu1p3.jpg

The street is 100 ft wide, and 50 ft long.
The walkway will weigh 40 pounds per feet when it is parallel to the street and 30 pounds per feet when it is crossing the street.

How should the walkway be laid out to have a minimal weight?

Homework Equations



I'm going to call the horizontal portion of the walkway x ft of length, and the portion that crosses the street y ft of length. So the total length of the walkway would be x+y.
Then the equation for the total weight of the walkway would be 40x + 30y, right?
Also I'm not sure if the pythagorean theorem should come into play here.

The Attempt at a Solution



This is where I'm really, really confused. I know that when you do an optimization problem , the hard part is finding the right equation. I have no idea what that is. Can someone just give me a little prod in the right direction? Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
x and y are not independent. You can write y in terms of x if you finally decide you do need the pythagorean theorem. The right triangle containing y has one leg of length 100-x and another of 50.
 
So y would be:

[tex]\sqrt{100^2 + (50-x)^2}[/tex]

Now do I take the derivative of that?
 
Use the chain rule. Besides, you actually want to take the derivative of 40x+30y, right?
 
Would the derivative be

[tex]-(50-x)^{2}[/tex]

But how would taking the derivative help me? Is it related to the 40 lb/ft and the 30 lb/ft?
 
You take the derivative and set it equal to zero. But your guess for the derivative is way off. The derivative of sqrt(f(x))=f'(x)/(2*sqrt(f(x)). How did I know that?
 
Umm, all I can tell is that you must have gotten the derivative out of

(1/2) x (y') x (y^(-1/2))

But I don't really understand how you got that. See, I'm not very good at using the Chain Rule, and what I did was just

[tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex] x [tex]\sqrt{0 + (50-2)^{2}}^{-\frac{1}{2}}[/tex] x (2 x (-1))
 
You've got a good start there but in this case y=100^2+(50-x)^2. y' isn't 2*(-1). What is it? And the denominator is sqrt(100^2+(50-x)^2), why did the the 100^2 turn to zero and the x disappear?
 
Last edited:
I got the ( 2 * -1) part from differentiating (50-x)^2.
 
  • #10
The derivative of (50-x)^2 is 2*(50-x)*(-1).
 
  • #11
Oh right!
The 100^2 turned to 0 because it is an integer and you can't differentiate it anymore. The x disappeared because it is only to the one-power.
 
  • #12
chompysj said:
Umm, all I can tell is that you must have gotten the derivative out of

(1/2) x (y') x (y^(-1/2))

But I don't really understand how you got that. See, I'm not very good at using the Chain Rule, and what I did was just

[tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex] x [tex]\sqrt{0 + (50-2)^{2}}^{-\frac{1}{2}}[/tex] x (2 x (-1))

The sqrt comes from y^(-1/2). That's NOT (y')^(-1/2). You might want to review differentiation in general.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K