Orbits & Projectiles: Why the Difference?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mtanti
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Orbits Projectiles
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the differences between projectile motion and orbital motion, specifically why projectiles fall towards the Earth while satellites in orbit do not. Participants explore the implications of Earth's curvature, the nature of gravitational forces, and the trajectories of various objects under different conditions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that projectiles launched horizontally fall due to gravity, but the Earth's curvature allows them to maintain a trajectory that does not intersect the surface at high speeds.
  • Others argue that gravity always pulls projectiles towards the center of the Earth, leading to elliptical paths rather than simple parabolic trajectories.
  • A participant questions the relevance of Earth's curvature and suggests that it might lead to a spiral trajectory towards the Earth, raising a comparison to the paths of comets approaching the Sun.
  • One participant suggests that all trajectories are elliptical, with the eccentricity changing based on the speed of the projectile, and discusses the conditions for achieving circular orbits.
  • Another participant notes that a spiral trajectory towards a planet is not possible without air resistance, as it would require continuously decreasing horizontal speed.
  • There is a clarification that projectiles fired at or above escape velocity follow parabolic or hyperbolic trajectories, which can lead them to escape Earth's gravitational influence.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of projectile trajectories and the role of Earth's curvature, with no consensus reached on the implications of these factors. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specifics of how trajectories behave under various conditions.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions about the ideal conditions (such as the absence of air resistance) are not explicitly stated, which may affect the understanding of the discussed trajectories. The discussion also relies on definitions of terms like "escape velocity" and "elliptical paths," which may vary in interpretation.

mtanti
Messages
172
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone,

Why is it that in projectiles we learn that a mass launched horizontally will always fall towards gravity regardless of its horizontal velocity but in orbiting satellites this does not happen?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
They do, it's just that the Earth curves out from under them as they do. The thing with projectiles fired horizontally on the Earth is that, unless you fire them with a very high speed, the Earth's curvature doesn't become enough of a factor to worry about. Both fall due to gravity, its just that once you launch them at a high enough speed, the resulting trajectory no longer intersects the surface of the Earth.
 
Not sure what the curvature of the Earth has to do with it because gravity will still pull the projectile towards the surface, but wouldn't that just result in a spiral towards the Earth then? Perhaps the answer would help me understand why comets don't just go straight into the sun as they approach it?
 
Last edited:
Okay, I'm going to assume that you've been taught that if you fire a projectile horizontally, it will always follow a parabolic path until it hits the ground. This actually isn't true, because it assumes that the Earth is flat and that the force of gravity always acts in a direction perpendicular to the flat surface.

The Earth isn't flat however, and the force of gravity always points to the center of the Earth. The result is that the projectile actually follows an elliptical path, with the center of the Earth at one focus of the ellipse. (Except for the cases where the projectile is fired at or above escape velocity, in which it will take a parabolic or hyberbolic tracjectory with the center of the Earth at the focus)

As the speed at which the projectile is fired increases, the eccentricity of the ellipse changes until it equals 0, at which point, the trajectory becomes a circle (which is a special case of ellipse.) and you have acheived a circular orbit. If the projectile is fird at even a higher speed, the trajectory becomes more elliptical course, but one where it climbs away from the Earth and then returns to its original point, then repeats. It enters an elliptical orbit with a perigee at the original launch point.

All objects following ballistic paths with respect to a central gravitational body wil follow these types of trajectories. Comets follow either ellipitic or hyperbolic trajectories. If the perihelion (closest approach to the Sun's center) is outside the Sun's surface, the comet will miss the Sun on the close approach and head back out into space. (Some comets do strike the Sun, as there trajectories intersect the surface).
 
Oh, so every trajectory is an elliptical path, and the faster a projectile goes, the larger the ellipse until it is larger than the earth. Correct?
 
Is it even possible for something to spiral down into a planet, as in goes round and round and lower and lower until it crashes?
 
That is not possible if we assume that there is no air resistance, for a spiral can only be formed if its "curvature" keeps increasing, i.e. a spiral has to bend more and more as it goes inward.

In order for this "curveness" to increase, the horizontal speed of a projectile would have to be lowered continously, hence the need for some kind of resistance like air resistance.
 
mtanti said:
Oh, so every trajectory is an elliptical path, and the faster a projectile goes, the larger the ellipse until it is larger than the earth. Correct?

Nearly correct. Look at what Janus wrote in post #5, 2nd paragraph:

"(Except for the cases where the projectile is fired at or above escape velocity, in which it will take a parabolic or hyberbolic tracjectory with the center of the Earth at the focus)"

In this cases the projectile escapes into infinity...
 
  • #10
Oh ok, it's clear now. Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
19K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K