Order of Indefinite Double Integrals

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion confirms that the order of integration in indefinite double integrals does not yield the same results, as demonstrated with the function f(x,y)=1. The indefinite integral with respect to x produces x+c, while reversing the order results in xy+cx+d, indicating a discrepancy. The term "indefinite double integral" is not standard in mathematics, as there is no concept of a "double antiderivative." However, Fubini's Theorem allows for the reversal of integration order in definite integrals, provided certain conditions are met regarding the finiteness of the integrals.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of multivariable calculus concepts
  • Familiarity with Fubini's Theorem
  • Knowledge of indefinite and definite integrals
  • Basic proficiency in evaluating integrals of functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Fubini's Theorem in detail
  • Explore examples of definite integrals with varying orders of integration
  • Learn about the conditions for the equality of double integrals
  • Investigate the implications of discontinuities in multivariable functions
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying calculus, multivariable functions, and integral theory.

Kushwoho44
Messages
25
Reaction score
1
Hi,

Rather simple question here, just want to confirm:

When we are dealing with indefinite double integrals, it's true to say

∫∫ f(x,y) dx dy = ∫∫ f(x,y) dy dx

i.e, order of integration doesn't matter right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Lets try it with a function f(x,y)=1. Its indefinite integral with respect to x is x+c. The indefinite integral of that with respect to y is xy+cy+d.

If you reverse the order of the variables, you get xy+cx+d, a different answer.

The term "indefinite double integral" is not really used in mathematics. Probably for this reason. You can find the antiderivative with respect to a given variable, but there is no "double antiderivative" as this calculation shows. On the other hand, you can calculate definite integrals of multivariable functions. And you can reverse the order of integration when you calculate those (Fubini's Theorem).
 
Vargo said:
On the other hand, you can calculate definite integrals of multivariable functions. And you can reverse the order of integration when you calculate those (Fubini's Theorem).

You can't always reverse that order, e.g.
$$
\int_0^1\int_0^1\frac{x^2-y^2}{(x^2+y^2)^2}\,\mathrm dx\,\mathrm dy = -\frac\pi4 \quad\mbox{ but } \quad \int_0^1\int_0^1\frac{x^2-y^2}{(x^2+y^2)^2}\,\mathrm dy\,\mathrm dx = +\frac\pi4
$$

Only when the two definite integrals
$$
\int_{y_1}^{y_2}\int_{x_1}^{x_2}\Big|f(x,y)\Big|\, \mathrm dx\,\mathrm dy <+\infty \quad\mbox{ and } \quad \int_{x_1}^{x_2}\int_{y_1}^{y_2}\Big|f(x,y)\Big|\, \mathrm dy\,\mathrm dx <+\infty
$$
exist, then they are equal, and also equal to
$$
\int_{y_1}^{y_2}\int_{x_1}^{x_2}f(x,y)\,\mathrm dx\,\mathrm dy = \int_{x_1}^{x_2}\int_{y_1}^{y_2}f(x,y)\,\mathrm dy\,\mathrm dx
$$
 
Interesting, thanks for both replies guys.
 
Relativistic Momentum, Mass, and Energy Momentum and mass (...), the classic equations for conserving momentum and energy are not adequate for the analysis of high-speed collisions. (...) The momentum of a particle moving with velocity ##v## is given by $$p=\cfrac{mv}{\sqrt{1-(v^2/c^2)}}\qquad{R-10}$$ ENERGY In relativistic mechanics, as in classic mechanics, the net force on a particle is equal to the time rate of change of the momentum of the particle. Considering one-dimensional...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K