Ordinary Differential equations question

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of Abel's theorem in the context of third-order constant coefficient homogeneous differential equations. It establishes that if the Wronskian W(y1, y2)(t) is positive for all real t, and W(y1, y2, y3)(0) equals zero, then there exist constants c1 and c2 such that c1y1(t) + c2y2(t) = y3(t) for all real t. This conclusion is definitive and highlights the relationship between the Wronskian and the linear dependence of solutions to differential equations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of third-order constant coefficient homogeneous differential equations
  • Familiarity with the Wronskian determinant and its properties
  • Knowledge of Abel's theorem and its implications in differential equations
  • Basic concepts of linear dependence and independence of functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the proof and applications of Abel's theorem in differential equations
  • Explore the calculation and interpretation of the Wronskian for various function sets
  • Investigate linear combinations of solutions to differential equations
  • Learn about higher-order differential equations and their solution methods
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and researchers focusing on differential equations, particularly those interested in the properties of solutions and their interrelationships.

Hutchyy
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
#17 If you can't see the picture: Suppose that y1, y2, and y3 are solutions to a third order constant coefficient homogeneous differential equation. Suppose further that for all real t, W(y1,y2)(t)>0, but also W(y1,y2,y3)(0)=0. Then there exists c1 and c2 such that c1y1(t) + c2y2(t) =y3(t) for all real t. Is this true, false or maybe true? I know it must have something to do with abel’s theorem but I can’t really figure out how it applies.. ,

what is the significance of plugging in 0 for ’t’ in the wronskian?

I'm thinking its something that has to do with abel's theorem but I can't make any connections as to how having a positive wronskian relates to a bigger wronskian with 0 plugged into equalling 0. https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/90663
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There's something wrong with your attachment. I can't view it.
 
Screen Shot 2015-10-23 at 11.37.35 PM.png
Screen Shot 2015-10-23 at 11.37.35 PM.png
 
When y= 0 (along the x-axis), dy/dx= 0. Which of the direction fields has that property? When x= 0 (along the y axis) dy/dx= y^2. Which of the direction fields has that property?
 
Thanks halls of ivy! But I got that one! I meant number 17 the word problem
 

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K