Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the sizing of an orifice for a home snow gun, specifically aiming to achieve a flow rate of 0.06 gallons per minute (GPM) at a water pressure of 350 PSI. Participants explore various methods to control the flow rate and the challenges associated with achieving the desired specifications.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory
- Technical explanation
- Debate/contested
- Experimental/applied
Main Points Raised
- One participant inquires about the size of the orifice needed to achieve a flow rate of 0.06 GPM under specified pressure conditions.
- Another suggests using a needle valve to control the flow rate, although the area is noted to be small.
- A participant expresses the need for a specific hole size to achieve a flow rate between 0.06 and 0.09 GPM, emphasizing the challenges of controlling such a small orifice.
- Concerns are raised about the accuracy of predicting the discharge coefficient for very small holes, with a proposed orifice diameter of 0.016 inches based on certain assumptions.
- Participants discuss the necessity of mixing water directly with air for effective atomization, rather than allowing water to trickle into the air stream.
- One participant suggests using a ratio of flow to area and mentions the importance of filtering the water to prevent clogging.
- Another participant recommends exploring fine mist nozzles from manufacturers, noting their potential for small sizes and built-in screens, while also acknowledging clogging issues.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express differing views on the feasibility of achieving the desired flow rate with an orifice, with some proposing alternative methods such as using a needle valve or fine mist nozzles. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the optimal approach and the specific size of the orifice needed.
Contextual Notes
There are limitations regarding the assumptions made about the discharge coefficient and the potential for clogging in small orifices. The discussion also highlights the need for precise control in a small area, which complicates the implementation of the proposed solutions.