Orifice Sizing for Home Snow Gun: Achieving 0.06 GPM with 350 PSI Water Pressure

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter homesnowmaker
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Orifice Sizing
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the sizing of an orifice for a home snow gun, specifically aiming to achieve a flow rate of 0.06 gallons per minute (GPM) at a water pressure of 350 PSI. Participants explore various methods to control the flow rate and the challenges associated with achieving the desired specifications.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about the size of the orifice needed to achieve a flow rate of 0.06 GPM under specified pressure conditions.
  • Another suggests using a needle valve to control the flow rate, although the area is noted to be small.
  • A participant expresses the need for a specific hole size to achieve a flow rate between 0.06 and 0.09 GPM, emphasizing the challenges of controlling such a small orifice.
  • Concerns are raised about the accuracy of predicting the discharge coefficient for very small holes, with a proposed orifice diameter of 0.016 inches based on certain assumptions.
  • Participants discuss the necessity of mixing water directly with air for effective atomization, rather than allowing water to trickle into the air stream.
  • One participant suggests using a ratio of flow to area and mentions the importance of filtering the water to prevent clogging.
  • Another participant recommends exploring fine mist nozzles from manufacturers, noting their potential for small sizes and built-in screens, while also acknowledging clogging issues.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the feasibility of achieving the desired flow rate with an orifice, with some proposing alternative methods such as using a needle valve or fine mist nozzles. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the optimal approach and the specific size of the orifice needed.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding the assumptions made about the discharge coefficient and the potential for clogging in small orifices. The discussion also highlights the need for precise control in a small area, which complicates the implementation of the proposed solutions.

homesnowmaker
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I think my forum name gives it away, I am a home snow maker looking to make a new snow gun and I need a little help from you guys.

Here is my dilemma/situation. I have water flowing at 350 psi, into a pipe that has 100 psi, a differential pressure of 250 psi. I only want .06 gallons per minute of water to enter into the air stream. I was wondering what size orifice would be need to achieve this? thank you all for your help


is this possible?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is there a way you could just use a needle valve to control the flow rate?
 
no it is in such a small area. I need to just figure out what size whole will offer me a flow rate between .06 and .09 at the specs I mentioned before.
 
Hi snowmaker. I like Andy's idea of adjusting using a valve, but the valve will be very small. Cv will be only 0.0038, which puts it into a very special class of valve.

If you do this with an orifice, you won't get good control, primarily because the discharge coefficient of a hole that small can't be accurately predicted. Let's assume you can cut a http://www.birdprecision.com/PDFs/BDS_sharp_edge_orifices.pdf" with a Cd of 0.6, then the hole size has to be 0.016 inches in diameter. So you're talking really tiny stuff.

Also, if you need the velocity after the water goes through the hole to help atomize the water, you won't be able to put the restriction into a tube and then pipe it over to your air line. All that will do is allow the water to trickle out into the air line in big fat drops. What you'll need to do is to have the jet of water mixed directly with the air as it discharges from the restriction.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thank you for the help, how big of a hole would be needed if the flow rate was to be around .09 gpm? so you do not think that this has any chance of working at all?
 
Just ratio the flow to the area. It can be made to work, but consider filtering the water to minimize erosion and potential clogging.
 
other then filtering what would you suggest to help make it work?
 
Have you checked out fine mist nozzles? There are a lot of manufacturers like Steinen and Danfoss-Hago. They are cheap because they are usually used for oil burning furnaces. I have seen some very small sizes. They are rated at 100 psi so you would have to get a chart for a particular nozzle to see how it flows at 250 psid.

They will have their own built in sintered screen but clogging on nozzles with holes that small is still a problem.

For example:
http://hago.danfoss.com/xxTypex/146069_5TH4449.html
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
28K
Replies
1
Views
2K