Orthohydrogen to Parahydrogen: What particle?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the transition of diatomic hydrogen molecules from Orthohydrogen to Parahydrogen, specifically the emission of a photon during this cooling process. It explains that at infinite temperature, hydrogen molecules are equally likely to occupy any of their four spin states, resulting in a fixed ortho- to para- ratio of 3:1 due to the three spin states available for ortho hydrogen. As temperature decreases, lower energy states become more favorable, allowing for a higher proportion of para hydrogen. At very low temperatures, the likelihood of occupying the lower energy state increases significantly, leading to a complete transition to para hydrogen at absolute zero. This highlights the relationship between temperature and the distribution of hydrogen spin states.
Chalmers
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
What subatomic particle is emitted when a diatomic Hydrogen molecule transitions from Orthohydrogen to Parahydrogen? e.g. during cooling

And why can you cool a sample of Hydrogen to assure that all H2 molecules are para-, but you cannot heat to have any more than 3:1 ortho-:para- ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Chalmers said:
What subatomic particle is emitted when a diatomic Hydrogen molecule transitions from Orthohydrogen to Parahydrogen? e.g. during cooling

I assume a photon.

Chalmers said:
And why can you cool a sample of Hydrogen to assure that all H2 molecules are para-, but you cannot heat to have any more than 3:1 ortho-:para- ?

Well, what's the difference between ortho- and para-?
 
Chalmers said:
And why can you cool a sample of Hydrogen to assure that all H2 molecules are para-, but you cannot heat to have any more than 3:1 ortho-:para- ?

The short reason is that in the limit of infinite temperature, any given hydrogen molecule is equally likely to be in anyone of its four spin spin states. Since there are three spin states for ortho hydrogen and only one for para hydrogen, you get a fixed proportion of 3:1 even in the limit of infinite temperature.

At lower than infinite temperatures, lower energy states will be more likely to be occupied. Still, since there are three times as many high energy spin states to low energy spin states, you can have equilibrium proportions near 3:1 even at room temperature.

At very low temperatures (relatively speaking), the lower energy state is so much more likely to be occupied than any higher energy state, that the proportion goes down and down, until at absolute zero, you get a proportion of 0:1, with all the hydrogen being para hydrogen.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top