Osbourne Reynolds: The Sub-mechanics of the Universe

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jasc15
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Reynolds Universe
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on Osbourne Reynolds' publication titled "The Sub-mechanics of the Universe," which explores theories involving particles with diameters of 10-18 cm. Participants express skepticism regarding the validity of the paper, questioning whether it serves as a model or an explanation of the sub-mechanical universe. The article referenced, available at http://jilawww.colorado.edu/perkinsgroup/Purcell_life_at_low_reynolds_number.pdf, provides context but is described as "nutty," leading to a lack of interest in purchasing the book.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of particle physics and subatomic particles
  • Familiarity with Reynolds number and its implications in fluid dynamics
  • Knowledge of theoretical physics concepts
  • Ability to analyze scientific literature and publications
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of Reynolds number in low Reynolds number fluid dynamics
  • Explore particle physics focusing on subatomic particles and their characteristics
  • Investigate theoretical models in physics that address sub-mechanical phenomena
  • Read critiques and analyses of Osbourne Reynolds' works and their scientific impact
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, physicists, and students interested in advanced particle physics, fluid dynamics, and theoretical models of the universe will benefit from this discussion.

jasc15
Messages
162
Reaction score
5
Osbourne Reynolds: "The Sub-mechanics of the Universe"

While reading a very interesting article/lecture called http://jilawww.colorado.edu/perkinsgroup/Purcell_life_at_low_reynolds_number.pdf, there was a reference to a publication by Osbourne Reynolds called The Sub-mechanics of the Universe. The author/speaker says "[Reynolds] published a very long paper on the details of the sub mechanical universe , and he had a complete theory which involved small particles of diameter 10^{-18} cm. It gets very nutty from there on."

https://www.amazon.com/dp/1418181897/?tag=pfamazon01-20, with a preview of some of the text. It is indeed very nutty, but also very interesting. Can anyone shed some light on this? Is there validity to this paper? Is it intended to be a model of the sub-mechanical universe rather than an explanation?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


Bump.

I really thought this would get a few responses, so i figured i'd give it another chance.
 


Nobody is going to buy the book, or even read dozens of pages, particularly when it's described as "nutty".
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
12K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
12K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K