Oscillations in transient response

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the occurrence of oscillations in the transient response of control systems, particularly focusing on the implications of different system orders and their transfer functions. Participants explore the mathematical basis for these oscillations and their significance in stability analysis.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question why oscillations are represented in the impulse response of a system described by a simple transfer function, such as 1/(s+1), which yields a decaying exponential.
  • Others argue that oscillations occur primarily in second-order or higher-order systems due to the presence of complex poles in their transfer functions.
  • A participant suggests that the oscillatory behavior can be modeled by a combination of a decaying exponential and a sine wave, indicating that not all systems behave simply as described by their transfer functions.
  • One participant emphasizes that the damping ratio of a system determines whether oscillations will occur, noting that a damping ratio less than 1 leads to oscillatory responses.
  • There is a contention regarding the interpretation of transient responses in first-order systems, with some asserting that such systems do not exhibit oscillations, while others question the nature of transient responses in relation to oscillations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the role of oscillations in transient responses, particularly regarding first-order systems. While some agree that oscillations are characteristic of higher-order systems, others challenge the notion that first-order systems lack transient responses entirely. The discussion remains unresolved on several points, particularly concerning the interpretation of transient responses and the conditions under which oscillations arise.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the mathematical treatment of transfer functions and their roots is crucial for understanding oscillatory behavior. The discussion highlights the complexity of modeling and the potential for varying interpretations based on system characteristics.

erece
Messages
70
Reaction score
0
Why oscillations occur in transient response of a system ?
Suppose transfer function of a system is 1/(s+1). Then its impulse response will be c(t)=e[itex]^{}-t[/itex] . So why just we don't show only an exponential curve to graphically represent the impulse response, why we also show the oscillations ?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I am really not getting what your point is. Can you elaborate it using pictures of waveforms etc?
 
Kholdstare said:
I am really not getting what your point is. Can you elaborate it using pictures of waveforms etc?

please see the attachment
in all the transient responses , the dashed curves show the actual time dependency of the output signal and solid curves show the oscillatory behavior . My question is this in studying control system when we have to judge the stability of the system we use the oscillatory behavior , but why is there an oscillatory behavior ?
We solved for the output of the system mathematically and got the output of the system in time domain as in example below , then how the oscillations come ?

Suppose transfer function of a system is 1/(s+1).
Then its impulse response will be c(t)=e^(-t) . So why just we don't show only an exponential curve to graphically represent the impulse response, why we also show the oscillations ?
 

Attachments

  • untitled.JPG
    untitled.JPG
    17.8 KB · Views: 664
Last edited:
erece said:
please see the attachment
in all the transient responses , the dashed curves show the actual time dependency of the output signal and solid curves show the oscillatory behavior . My question is this in studying control system when we have to judge the stability of the system we use the oscillatory behavior , but why is there an oscillatory behavior ?
We solved for the output of the system mathematically and got the output of the system in time domain as in example below , then how the oscillations come ?

Suppose transfer function of a system is 1/(s+1).
Then its impulse response will be c(t)=e^(-t) . So why just we don't show only an exponential curve to graphically represent the impulse response, why we also show the oscillations ?
The simple (and kind of obvious) answer is that not all systems have transfer functions that are as simple as your single pole example.
 
erece said:
Why oscillations occur in transient response of a system ?
If it's a second-order or higher order system, then it can overshoot & oscillate, depending on damping.
 
uart said:
The simple (and kind of obvious) answer is that not all systems have transfer functions that are as simple as your single pole example.

Yes, I think this is the answer.

To elaborate a little bit, if a system is truly described by the transfer function, c(t)=e−t , it should not oscillate. This system does not oscillate.

I think think what you are describing can be modeled by a decaying exponential with a delayed decaying sine wave. My control theory is a little rough, but I think the function you are thinking of would look something like c(t) = e-t *sin(t+T) (where T is a time delay.

I think your "problem" is just a simple matter of modeling. Sometimes. the oscillations aren't significant enough for an engineer to spend the time factoring it in. It is much easier to run a regression on a curve to find one variable in an exponential function than multiple variables in a decaying sine function.
 
smk037 said:
Yes, I think this is the answer.

To elaborate a little bit, if a system is truly described by the transfer function, c(t)=e−t , it should not oscillate. This system does not oscillate.

I think think what you are describing can be modeled by a decaying exponential with a delayed decaying sine wave. My control theory is a little rough, but I think the function you are thinking of would look something like c(t) = e-t *sin(t+T) (where T is a time delay.

I think your "problem" is just a simple matter of modeling. Sometimes. the oscillations aren't significant enough for an engineer to spend the time factoring it in. It is much easier to run a regression on a curve to find one variable in an exponential function than multiple variables in a decaying sine function.

sorry i posted wrong. c(t) is [itex]e^{-t}[/itex] . and no sin term

the graph of c(t) is simply decaying exponentially , then why do we show oscillations. I mean mathematically i showed that c(t) is just decaying exponential , and there is no sin term. So tell me where i am missing ?
 
The other curves you are showing are not described by the transferfunction

[itex]X\left(s\right) = \frac{1}{s+1}[/itex]
When you convert that particular transferfunction back to the time-domain, yes, you have an exponential.

But if you are dealing with a 2nd Order System then your system could be described by the differential equations:

[itex]y(t) + A\cdot y''(t) + B\cdot y'(t) = C\cdot x(t)[/itex]

When you do the LaPlace transform you end up with

[itex]Y(s) + As^{2}Y(s) + BsY(s) = CX(s)[/itex]

You can then go ahead and describe the transferfunction as

[itex]H(s) = \frac{Y(s)}{X(s)} = \frac{C/A}{s^{2}+ B/As + 1/A}[/itex]

Now we are ready to solve this and get a clear description of the output.

The BOTTOM term of the fraction is very important, since it is a basic second order polynomial it is straight forward to solve it.

It will have two roots s1 and s2. When you know the roots it is possible to factorize it into

[itex]H(s) = \frac{C/A}{(s-s1)(s-s2)}[/itex]

Now these roots can be in three different formats:

1. Two distinct real roots s1 and s2
2. A double real root s1
3. Two complex-conjugate roots s1 and s1*

IF it happens that the roots are COMPLEX, when you go back to the time domain by doing the partial fraction expansion, you will find that you will get sines and cosines.-

And that is where the oscilations come from.

Now when are the roots complex? - It depends on the coefficients A, B and C.

You will find that these coefficients are written in other ways also, and one very common way is to write the transferfunction in terms of a damping ratio [itex]\varsigma[/itex].

It takes a bit of basic algebra to get to the point where the damping ratio will tell you all you need to know, namely:

1. If the damping ratio is less than 1, you will have oscillations
2. If the damping ratio is 1 or more, you will not have oscillations.

The graph of a damped system (damping ratio more than 1) will LOOK like an exponetial, but is in fact NOT an exponential - which can be seen if one does the math and calculates the time domain behavior of y(t) in each of the three cases (real roots, 1 double real root, complex roots).
 
thanks for the reply
in books they took a first order system , calculated its response in time domain by using the inverse laplace of system function and got an decaying exponetial curve. Then they plot the exponential curve and marked the oscillations in that curve and said that " as the oscillations are decreasing , the system is stable". OK i know that in that particular impulse response if there are oscillations then they will die after sometime. But why there are oscillations ?
 
  • #10
If the book is talking about oscillations in a first order system the book is wrong.

Oscillations only happen in higher order systems. (2nd and above) due to the facts I stated in my last reply.

Mathematically the oscillations in higher order systems happen because of complex poles of the transfer function (roots of the polynomial in the bottom of the fraction). These complex poles are present because of the way the coefficients are chosen.

I don't know what to say other than that. That IS the reason why there is oscillations.

In an electrical circuit it comes because you don't have a big enough resistor in your LCR circuit.
 
  • #11
So you mean there is no transient response for 1st order system ?
because transient response are associated with oscillations.
 
  • #12
erece said:
So you mean there is no transient response for 1st order system ?
because transient response are associated with oscillations.
No, it doesn't need to oscillate to be a transient response. The transient response of a first order system is an exponential.
 
  • #13
Yes, as uart says. The steady-state response of a 1st order system is a DC. The transient will be an exponential.

A 2nd order system can have oscillatory transients, and its steady-state response can also be oscillatory (if there is no damping at all).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K