I have recently learned a bit about the Osterwalder-Schrader theorem. From my understanding, this tells you when a Euclidean path integral can be analytically continued to a valid relativistic Hermitian quantum field theory (one needs reflection positivity etc.).(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I am curious about corresponding results for non-relativistic theories. Let's say I have a Euclidean field theory where there isn't full rotational symmetry; if a definite example is needed, let's say I want it to Wick-rotate to a Galilean-invariant theory. Is there a corresponding theorem for what properties are needed in the Euclidean theory for the Wick rotation (which is used all the time) to guarantees a valid Hermitian quantum field theory?

I don't have an extremely strong background in the mathematics behind AQFT. I did find this statement of the OS theorem by Urs Schreiber (who I know posts here), which gives rotational invariance as an assumption. So my question boils down to whether this assumption can be relaxed.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# A Osterwalder-Schrader theorem and non-relativistic QM

Have something to add?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads - Osterwalder Schrader theorem | Date |
---|---|

I Bell's Theorem and Reality | Feb 13, 2018 |

A Time independence of a Noether charge in QFT? | Feb 10, 2018 |

A Probability of obtaining general quantum measurement outcome | Feb 5, 2018 |

A Fundamental Theorem of Quantum Measurements | Jan 24, 2018 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**