Mental Gridlock
- 17
- 0
Don't worry wolram, and don't apologize. There was nothing wrong with what you posted. Period. If others get offended by it, it's their problem.
Thank you! I'm sure so many people were being "offended" by the use of adjectives.
What do you mean, so it's "ethnic"? You should clarify this. Do you mean it's racism because both parties are white?
Dave, where was he "explicit" that he was dispicable BECAUSE he's Iraqi? Or saying in any way that one race is superior to another (i.e. racism). Check your dictionary. Simple mention of race is NOT racism. The fact that you interpret this as racism is not based on explicit words, rather it's based on your ASSUMPTION (why else would he say it if not to be racist?) of words that could be used for any number of purposes. But you infer one purpose and assume it and claim it to be the words of a "racist pig". I'm not trying to defend wolram, rather I'm trying to point out when people get anally conservative and whine about everything.
That has an easy answer. Adjectives are used in writing to create vivid language. They provide the reader with more information about the subject and make the words more enoyable or informative. The way wolram worded it painted a much clearer picture than Evo's vague replacement ("this person").
Okay you automatically get the final say. You're the moderator! I understand. Please don't delete this message or close the thread yet. I'm just asking for the courtesy of an explanation as to how these comments warranted being edited. I understand the purpose of rules and moderators on this forum! I just think that in this case the action taken was senseless. Can you at least show me how it's not?
Evo said:I edited the offending post.
Thank you! I'm sure so many people were being "offended" by the use of adjectives.
Evo said:Actually both parties are the same race, caucasian, so it's ethnic.
What do you mean, so it's "ethnic"? You should clarify this. Do you mean it's racism because both parties are white?
DaveC426913 said:He was explicit - not much room for misinterpretation
Dave, where was he "explicit" that he was dispicable BECAUSE he's Iraqi? Or saying in any way that one race is superior to another (i.e. racism). Check your dictionary. Simple mention of race is NOT racism. The fact that you interpret this as racism is not based on explicit words, rather it's based on your ASSUMPTION (why else would he say it if not to be racist?) of words that could be used for any number of purposes. But you infer one purpose and assume it and claim it to be the words of a "racist pig". I'm not trying to defend wolram, rather I'm trying to point out when people get anally conservative and whine about everything.
DaveC426913 said:Why would he mention it if it weren't relevant to the point?
That has an easy answer. Adjectives are used in writing to create vivid language. They provide the reader with more information about the subject and make the words more enoyable or informative. The way wolram worded it painted a much clearer picture than Evo's vague replacement ("this person").
Evo said:We can stop discussing it now.
Okay you automatically get the final say. You're the moderator! I understand. Please don't delete this message or close the thread yet. I'm just asking for the courtesy of an explanation as to how these comments warranted being edited. I understand the purpose of rules and moderators on this forum! I just think that in this case the action taken was senseless. Can you at least show me how it's not?