Overcoming friction and then some.

  • Thread starter Thread starter anyone1979
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Friction
anyone1979
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Overcoming friction and then some.

Can anybody help me figure if I have this right?

You push a loaded wheelbarrow of mass 130 kg, exerting a horizontal force of 120 N as you do so. As the wheelbarrow moves, the frictional force acting on it is 85 N.
(a) If you begin from rest, how far do you push the wheelbarrow before reaching a moderate walking speed of 1.3 m/s?
(b) Over this distance, how much work do you do on the wheelbarrow?
(c) How much work does the frictional force do on the wheelbarrow?
(d) What is the final kinetic energy of the wheelbarrow?


a) a = 120/130 = .9m/s^2
1.3^2 = 2(.9)(x)
1.69/1.8 = .94 m

b) W = 120(.94) = 112.8J

c) W = 85(.94)(-1) = -79.9J

d) K = 1/2(130)(1.3^2) = 109.85J
 
Physics news on Phys.org
anyone1979 said:
Can anybody help me figure if I have this right?

You push a loaded wheelbarrow of mass 130 kg, exerting a horizontal force of 120 N as you do so. As the wheelbarrow moves, the frictional force acting on it is 85 N.
(a) If you begin from rest, how far do you push the wheelbarrow before reaching a moderate walking speed of 1.3 m/s?
(b) Over this distance, how much work do you do on the wheelbarrow?
(c) How much work does the frictional force do on the wheelbarrow?
(d) What is the final kinetic energy of the wheelbarrow?


a) a = 120/130 = .9m/s^2
1.3^2 = 2(.9)(x)
1.69/1.8 = .94 m

b) W = 120(.94) = 112.8J

c) W = 85(.94)(-1) = -79.9J

d) K = 1/2(130)(1.3^2) = 109.85J
In calculating the acceleration, you must use the NET force acting on the wheelbarrow, not just the applied force.
 
But isn't the NET force equal to the force (120) since that is the only force without a nonzero x-component?

or am I wrong?
 
anyone1979 said:
But isn't the NET force equal to the force (120) since that is the only force without a nonzero x-component?

or am I wrong?
What about the given friction force which opposes the motion in the horizontal direction?
 
You are right, thank you.

Will this cover it? (NET force = applied force - friction force)
 
anyone1979 said:
You are right, thank you.

Will this cover it? (NET force = applied force - friction force)
yes, that is correct, in the x direction.
 
Thank you for your help
 

Similar threads

Replies
57
Views
4K
Replies
21
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K