Overdamping Limit: Approximating mL^2θ + bθ + mgLsinθ = Γ

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Jeans
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the conditions necessary to approximate the equation for an overdamped pendulum, specifically focusing on the transition from a second-order differential equation to its overdamped limit. The original equation involves parameters such as mass, damping coefficient, gravitational force, and torque.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of small angle approximations for sin(θ) and discuss the need for non-dimensionalization of the equation. There is an attempt to connect the conditions for overdamping with previous experiences and teacher guidance.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the mathematical transformations needed to simplify the original equation. There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of these transformations, and while some clarity has emerged, explicit consensus on the approach has not been reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem may imply conditions that apply for all values of θ, which raises questions about the validity of certain approximations. Additionally, there is mention of guidance from a teacher suggesting a rescaling approach without solving the ODE directly.

Math Jeans
Messages
347
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find the conditions under which it is valid to approximate the equation

[tex]mL^2\ddot{\theta}+b\dot{\theta}+mgLsin\theta=\Gamma[/tex]

by its overdamped limit
[tex]b\dot{\theta}+mgLsin\theta=\Gamma[/tex]

Homework Equations



The formula is for an overdamped pendulum where b is the damping coefficient, and Gamma is a torque on the pendulum.

The Attempt at a Solution



I know from past experience that the conditions are [tex]b^2>>m^2gL^3[/tex], but I'm not sure how to obtain that from the equation.

Thanks,
Jeans
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If [itex]\theta[/itex] is "small," [itex]sin(\theta)~\approx~\theta[/itex]. Under this condition you can replace [itex]sin(\theta)[/itex] in your differential equation to make it a linear d.e with constant coefficients. Is that enough of a start?
 
I had considered doing that and then equalizing the equations, but the problem is implying that it is done for all theta.

Here's an email from my teacher regarding it. I don't really know how much of it I understand (I just got the email this morning):

"No you don't need to solve for any ODE. Rescale the problem with time scale T, the coefficient preceding theta' should be 1, the coefficient preceding theta'' should be much less than 1. Check the overdamped bead on the hoop problem for similar procedure."
 
Ok! I think I get it! Essentially I had to non-dimensionalize the equation by getting rid of the double-dot term.

[tex]mL^2\ddot{\theta}+b\dot{\theta}+mgLsin\theta=\Gamma[/tex]

[tex]mL^2\frac{d^2\theta}{dt^2}+b\frac{d\theta}{dt}+mgLsin\theta=\Gamma[/tex]

[tex]\frac{L}{g}\frac{d^2\theta}{dt^2}+\frac{b}{mgL}\frac{d\theta}{dt}+sin\theta=\frac{\Gamma}{mgL}[/tex]

Define: [tex]\tau=\frac{mgL}{b}t --> t=\frac{b}{mgL}\tau[/tex]

[tex]\frac{d\theta}{dt}=\frac{d\theta}{\frac{b}{mgL}d\tau}=\theta'[/tex]
[tex]\frac{d^2\theta}{dt^2}=\frac{d^2\theta}{\frac{b^2}{m^2g^2L^2}d\tau}=\theta''[/tex]

Apply the new definition:

[tex]\frac{L*m^2g^2L^2}{gb^2}\theta''+\theta'+sin\theta=\frac{\Gamma}{mgL} --> \frac{m^2gL^3}{b^2}\theta''+\theta'+sin\theta=\frac{\Gamma}{mgL}[/tex]

And there is my [tex]\frac{m^2gL^3}{b^2}[/tex] which agrees with what I thought was the answer.

Then if we multiply out the function under Gamma on the right side of the equation and substitute t back in, we are left with the original equation minus the double-dot term. Yay!

QATC?

thanks a bunch,
Jeans
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K