MHB P divides all the coefficients of the terms with degree <8

mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

$f(x)=\sum_{i=0}^{7}{a_ix^i}, g(x)=\sum_{i=0}^{5}{b_ix^i}$, $a_i, b_i$ are integer coefficients.
The prime $p$ divides $a_0, a_1, a_2, a_3, a_4$ but it does not divide $a_5, a_6, a_7$. $p$ divides also $b_0, b_1, b_2$, but it does not divide $b_3, b_4, b_5$.
$h(x)=f(x)g(x)$
Show that at $h(x)$ $p$ does not divide the coefficient of $x^8$, but it does divide all the coefficients of the terms with degree $<8$.

We suppose that $p \mid c_8$.
$p \mid b_1 \Rightarrow p \mid a_7 b_1$
$p \mid b_2 \Rightarrow p \mid a_6 b_2$
$p \mid a_3 \Rightarrow p \mid a_3 b_5$
$p \mid a_4 \Rightarrow p \mid a_4 b_4$

$c_8=a_7b_1+a_6b_2+a_5b_3+a_4b_4+a_3b_5 \Rightarrow a_5 b_3=c_8-a_7b_1-a_6 b_2-a_4 b_4-a_3b_5$

$p \mid c_8-a_7b_1-a_6 b_2-a_4 b_4-a_3b_5 \Rightarrow p \mid a_5 b_3$
Since $p$ is a prime $p \mid a_5$ or $p \mid b_3$. Both are not true, so $p \nmid c_8$.

To show that $p$ divides all the coefficients of the terms with degree $<8$, what am I supposed to do? Do I have to calculate all the coefficients and find that $p$ divides them? Or is there an other way to show this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mathmari said:
Hey! :o

$f(x)=\sum_{i=0}^{7}{a_ix^i}, g(x)=\sum_{i=0}^{5}{b_ix^i}$, $a_i, b_i$ are integer coefficients.
The prime $p$ divides $a_0, a_1, a_2, a_3, a_4$ but it does not divide $a_5, a_6, a_7$. $p$ divides also $b_0, b_1, b_2$, but it does not divide $b_3, b_4, b_5$.
$h(x)=f(x)g(x)$
Show that at $h(x)$ $p$ does not divide the coefficient of $x^8$, but it does divide all the coefficients of the terms with degree $<8$.

We suppose that $p \mid c_8$.
$p \mid b_1 \Rightarrow p \mid a_7 b_1$
$p \mid b_2 \Rightarrow p \mid a_6 b_2$
$p \mid a_3 \Rightarrow p \mid a_3 b_5$
$p \mid a_4 \Rightarrow p \mid a_4 b_4$

$c_8=a_7b_1+a_6b_2+a_5b_3+a_4b_4+a_3b_5 \Rightarrow a_5 b_3=c_8-a_7b_1-a_6 b_2-a_4 b_4-a_3b_5$

$p \mid c_8-a_7b_1-a_6 b_2-a_4 b_4-a_3b_5 \Rightarrow p \mid a_5 b_3$
Since $p$ is a prime $p \mid a_5$ or $p \mid b_3$. Both are not true, so $p \nmid c_8$.

To show that $p$ divides all the coefficients of the terms with degree $<8$, what am I supposed to do? Do I have to calculate all the coefficients and find that $p$ divides them? Or is there an other way to show this?

Hii! ;)

I suggest to verify $c_7$ and make an argument for the others.
 
I like Serena said:
Hii! ;)

I suggest to verify $c_7$ and make an argument for the others.

$c_7=a_7b_0+a_6b_1+a_5b_2+a_4b_3+a_3b_4+a_2b_5$

$p \mid b_0 \Rightarrow p \mid a_7 b_0$
$p \mid b_1 \Rightarrow p \mid a_6 b_1$
$p \mid b_2 \Rightarrow p \mid a_5 b_2$
$p \mid a_2 \Rightarrow p \mid a_2 b_5$
$p \mid a_3 \Rightarrow p \mid a_3 b_4$
$p \mid a_4 \Rightarrow p \mid a_4 b_3$

So $p \mid c_7$

What can I say for the others?
 
Note that:

$\displaystyle c_k = \sum_{i = 0}^k a_ib_{k-i}$

We will take $b_j = 0$ for $j > 5$.

If $k \leq 4$, then every term is divisible by $p$ since $p$ divides all the "$a$'s".

This leaves just 3 coefficients to check: $c_5,c_6,c_7$. We could manually compute them, but that seems like...ugh...work.

But notice that as the "$a$'s" count up, the "$b$'s" count down. So if the b terms take care of the a terms that aren't covered, every term in the sum will be divisible by $p$. And the LOWEST $k$ for which this happens is when the i in:

$a_ib_{k-i}$ is greater than 4, and the k-i in said term is greater than 2, that is:

$k = i + (k-i) \geq 5 + 3 = 8$.

Since 5,6 and 7 are all less than 8, $c_5,c_6,c_7$ are all divisible by $p$.
 
Last edited:
mathmari said:
$c_7=a_7b_0+a_6b_1+a_5b_2+a_4b_3+a_3b_4+a_2b_5$

$p \mid b_0 \Rightarrow p \mid a_7 b_0$
$p \mid b_1 \Rightarrow p \mid a_6 b_1$
$p \mid b_2 \Rightarrow p \mid a_5 b_2$
$p \mid a_2 \Rightarrow p \mid a_2 b_5$
$p \mid a_3 \Rightarrow p \mid a_3 b_4$
$p \mid a_4 \Rightarrow p \mid a_4 b_3$

So $p \mid c_7$

What can I say for the others?

As Deveno also remarked, we have low numbered $b_i$ that are divisible by $p$ or we have low numbered $a_i$ that are divisible by $p$.
For $c_7$ we have the worst case that still pans out.
So lower numbered $c_i$ will also be divisible by $p$.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
Back
Top