MHB P divides all the coefficients of the terms with degree <8

mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

$f(x)=\sum_{i=0}^{7}{a_ix^i}, g(x)=\sum_{i=0}^{5}{b_ix^i}$, $a_i, b_i$ are integer coefficients.
The prime $p$ divides $a_0, a_1, a_2, a_3, a_4$ but it does not divide $a_5, a_6, a_7$. $p$ divides also $b_0, b_1, b_2$, but it does not divide $b_3, b_4, b_5$.
$h(x)=f(x)g(x)$
Show that at $h(x)$ $p$ does not divide the coefficient of $x^8$, but it does divide all the coefficients of the terms with degree $<8$.

We suppose that $p \mid c_8$.
$p \mid b_1 \Rightarrow p \mid a_7 b_1$
$p \mid b_2 \Rightarrow p \mid a_6 b_2$
$p \mid a_3 \Rightarrow p \mid a_3 b_5$
$p \mid a_4 \Rightarrow p \mid a_4 b_4$

$c_8=a_7b_1+a_6b_2+a_5b_3+a_4b_4+a_3b_5 \Rightarrow a_5 b_3=c_8-a_7b_1-a_6 b_2-a_4 b_4-a_3b_5$

$p \mid c_8-a_7b_1-a_6 b_2-a_4 b_4-a_3b_5 \Rightarrow p \mid a_5 b_3$
Since $p$ is a prime $p \mid a_5$ or $p \mid b_3$. Both are not true, so $p \nmid c_8$.

To show that $p$ divides all the coefficients of the terms with degree $<8$, what am I supposed to do? Do I have to calculate all the coefficients and find that $p$ divides them? Or is there an other way to show this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mathmari said:
Hey! :o

$f(x)=\sum_{i=0}^{7}{a_ix^i}, g(x)=\sum_{i=0}^{5}{b_ix^i}$, $a_i, b_i$ are integer coefficients.
The prime $p$ divides $a_0, a_1, a_2, a_3, a_4$ but it does not divide $a_5, a_6, a_7$. $p$ divides also $b_0, b_1, b_2$, but it does not divide $b_3, b_4, b_5$.
$h(x)=f(x)g(x)$
Show that at $h(x)$ $p$ does not divide the coefficient of $x^8$, but it does divide all the coefficients of the terms with degree $<8$.

We suppose that $p \mid c_8$.
$p \mid b_1 \Rightarrow p \mid a_7 b_1$
$p \mid b_2 \Rightarrow p \mid a_6 b_2$
$p \mid a_3 \Rightarrow p \mid a_3 b_5$
$p \mid a_4 \Rightarrow p \mid a_4 b_4$

$c_8=a_7b_1+a_6b_2+a_5b_3+a_4b_4+a_3b_5 \Rightarrow a_5 b_3=c_8-a_7b_1-a_6 b_2-a_4 b_4-a_3b_5$

$p \mid c_8-a_7b_1-a_6 b_2-a_4 b_4-a_3b_5 \Rightarrow p \mid a_5 b_3$
Since $p$ is a prime $p \mid a_5$ or $p \mid b_3$. Both are not true, so $p \nmid c_8$.

To show that $p$ divides all the coefficients of the terms with degree $<8$, what am I supposed to do? Do I have to calculate all the coefficients and find that $p$ divides them? Or is there an other way to show this?

Hii! ;)

I suggest to verify $c_7$ and make an argument for the others.
 
I like Serena said:
Hii! ;)

I suggest to verify $c_7$ and make an argument for the others.

$c_7=a_7b_0+a_6b_1+a_5b_2+a_4b_3+a_3b_4+a_2b_5$

$p \mid b_0 \Rightarrow p \mid a_7 b_0$
$p \mid b_1 \Rightarrow p \mid a_6 b_1$
$p \mid b_2 \Rightarrow p \mid a_5 b_2$
$p \mid a_2 \Rightarrow p \mid a_2 b_5$
$p \mid a_3 \Rightarrow p \mid a_3 b_4$
$p \mid a_4 \Rightarrow p \mid a_4 b_3$

So $p \mid c_7$

What can I say for the others?
 
Note that:

$\displaystyle c_k = \sum_{i = 0}^k a_ib_{k-i}$

We will take $b_j = 0$ for $j > 5$.

If $k \leq 4$, then every term is divisible by $p$ since $p$ divides all the "$a$'s".

This leaves just 3 coefficients to check: $c_5,c_6,c_7$. We could manually compute them, but that seems like...ugh...work.

But notice that as the "$a$'s" count up, the "$b$'s" count down. So if the b terms take care of the a terms that aren't covered, every term in the sum will be divisible by $p$. And the LOWEST $k$ for which this happens is when the i in:

$a_ib_{k-i}$ is greater than 4, and the k-i in said term is greater than 2, that is:

$k = i + (k-i) \geq 5 + 3 = 8$.

Since 5,6 and 7 are all less than 8, $c_5,c_6,c_7$ are all divisible by $p$.
 
Last edited:
mathmari said:
$c_7=a_7b_0+a_6b_1+a_5b_2+a_4b_3+a_3b_4+a_2b_5$

$p \mid b_0 \Rightarrow p \mid a_7 b_0$
$p \mid b_1 \Rightarrow p \mid a_6 b_1$
$p \mid b_2 \Rightarrow p \mid a_5 b_2$
$p \mid a_2 \Rightarrow p \mid a_2 b_5$
$p \mid a_3 \Rightarrow p \mid a_3 b_4$
$p \mid a_4 \Rightarrow p \mid a_4 b_3$

So $p \mid c_7$

What can I say for the others?

As Deveno also remarked, we have low numbered $b_i$ that are divisible by $p$ or we have low numbered $a_i$ that are divisible by $p$.
For $c_7$ we have the worst case that still pans out.
So lower numbered $c_i$ will also be divisible by $p$.
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
4K