MHB How Does Velocity Impact Acceleration in Race Cars?

  • Thread starter Thread starter karush
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration Car
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the acceleration of a race car given its velocity function, which is defined as v_x(t) = (0.930 m/s^3)t^2. The acceleration is derived using the formula A = dv/dt, resulting in A = 1.86t. When the velocity reaches 14.5 m/s, the time calculated is approximately 3.94 seconds, leading to an acceleration of about 7.35 m/s². There is a minor discrepancy noted in the velocity function, questioning whether it should be 0.930 or 0.933. The calculations emphasize the relationship between velocity and acceleration in the context of race car dynamics.
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
A race car strarts from rest and travels east along a straight and level track.
For the firs $5.0s$ of the cars motion,
the eastward compent of the car's velocity,is given by
$v_x(t)=(0.930 m/s^3)t^2 $
What is acceleration of the car when $v_x=14.5$

ok my first step with this was

$$A=\frac{dv}{dt}=1.86t$$
if $v=14.5=0.933t^2$
then
$$t=3.94$$

so

$A(3.94)=1.86\cdot3.94=7.32 m/s^2$
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You give, as the speed function, [math]0.930 t^2[/math], but when calculating the time when the speed is 14.5, you have [math]0.933t^2[/math]. Which is correct, 0.930 or 0.933?
 
Hope this is better got lost in the W|A output

A race car strats from rest and travels east along a straight and level track.
For the first 5.0s of the cars motion,
the eastward compent of the car's velocity,is given by
$v_x(t)=(0.93 m/s^3)t^2$
a. What is acceleration of the car when $v_x=14.5
$$\begin{align*} \displaystyle
A&=\frac{dv}{dt}=1.86t\\
v&=14.5=0.93t^2\\
t&=3.94\\
A(3.94)&=1.86\cdot3.94=7.35 m/s^2
\end{align*}$$

I was ? on round off
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top