Parallel plane - electric field and potential

AI Thread Summary
When two parallel plates connected to a battery are brought closer together, the charge per unit area increases due to the increased electric field, but the potential difference remains unchanged because both plates experience equal increases in potential. If one plate is earthed while the other approaches it, the potential difference will still be controlled by the battery, leading to an increase in charge on the earthed plate. The potential of the approaching plate may seem to increase, but this is due to the influence of the other plate's potential, which complicates the relationship between charge and potential. Ultimately, the dynamics of electric fields and potentials in capacitors illustrate that increased charge density does not necessarily equate to a higher potential when considering the effects of both plates.
Deathnote777
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
parallel plane -- electric field and potential

Homework Statement


Consider 2 plate A and B. They are connected with a battery and their distance is halved. What will happen as a whole ?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


1. Charge per unit area increase due to increase in electric field.
2. I think the potential difference will not change although there is increase in charges because both A and B 's potential has increased by the same amount. So there will be no change in potential difference.
Am I right ?
I have another question.
1. If one of the plates(connected with battery) is earthed and they are put closer, what would happen ? Will the potential difference, number of charges and electric field change ?
2. If the amount of charges in the plates are fixed. One of the plates,A, is earthed originally. When B is approaching A, the number of charges in A is still constant, but why the potential of B will increase? Isn't it that only the number of charges determines a plate's potential ?Thank you
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


Deathnote777 said:
1. Charge per unit area increase due to increase in electric field.
2. I think the potential difference will not change although there is increase in charges because both A and B 's potential has increased by the same amount. So there will be no change in potential difference.
Right answer, wrong reason. One has a positive potential and the other negative. If they both increase, keeping a constant difference, then the positive will be more positive and the negative less negative. That fails on grounds of symmetry.
Neither potential changes, yet the charges increase. Do you see how that can be?
1. If one of the plates(connected with battery) is earthed and they are put closer, what would happen ? Will the potential difference, number of charges and electric field change ?
The P.D. is still controlled by the battery, so won't change. As before, the charge will increase.
2. If the amount of charges in the plates are fixed. One of the plates,A, is earthed originally. When B is approaching A, the number of charges in A is still constant, but why the potential of B will increase? Isn't it that only the number of charges determines a plate's potential ?
If A is earthed, its charge will change. Did you mean the charge of B is constant? What do you mean by 'the potential of B will increase'? Do you mean assuming it was positive? What makes you think it would increase? I think the P.D. will decrease.
 


haruspex said:
Right answer, wrong reason. One has a positive potential and the other negative. If they both increase, keeping a constant difference, then the positive will be more positive and the negative less negative. That fails on grounds of symmetry.
Neither potential changes, yet the charges increase. Do you see how that can be?
I think I am confused here. Why the potential of a plate will not change when the charge density has increased ? Assume there is one plate only. To my knowledge, increase in charge density in the plate will increase the force exerted on a charged object next to the plate. Hence, potential of that plate is increased, isn't it ?

haruspex said:
f A is earthed, its charge will change. Did you mean the charge of B is constant? What do you mean by 'the potential of B will increase'? Do you mean assuming it was positive? What makes you think it would increase? I think the P.D. will decrease.
I assume it is negative
 


Deathnote777 said:
I think I am confused here. Why the potential of a plate will not change when the charge density has increased ? Assume there is one plate only. To my knowledge, increase in charge density in the plate will increase the force exerted on a charged object next to the plate. Hence, potential of that plate is increased, isn't it ?
Yes, but the potential at a point in space is a result of the potentials due to all charges, including the other plate. As the plates are brought closer, the potential due to the other plate is strengthened. This is how capacitors work - they store a high charge without producing such a large voltage.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top