Parallel plate capacitor and charge density

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the charge density of a parallel plate capacitor with an area of 125 cm², a separation distance of 1.25 mm, and a potential difference of 10.0 V. The charge density, calculated using the formula σ = (Vε₀)/d, results in 8.5 x 10⁻⁸ C/m². It is clarified that the area is not necessary for determining charge density, which is specific to each plate, and that the total charge would require the area. The solution is validated through the application of Gaussian surfaces around the plates.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electrostatics principles
  • Familiarity with the formula for charge density (σ)
  • Knowledge of Gaussian surfaces in electrostatics
  • Basic proficiency in unit conversions (e.g., cm² to m²)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the charge density formula σ = (Vε₀)/d
  • Learn about the application of Gaussian surfaces in electrostatics
  • Explore the relationship between charge density and total charge in capacitors
  • Review the concepts of electric fields between parallel plates
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electrostatics, physics educators, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of capacitors and charge distribution.

tony873004
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
1,753
Reaction score
143

Homework Statement


A parallel plate capacitor with A=125 cm2 and d=1.25 mm is charged to a potential difference of 10.0 V. What is the charge density on each plate?


Homework Equations



[tex] V = \frac{{\sigma d}}{{\varepsilon _0 }}\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\,V\varepsilon _0 = \sigma d\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\,\sigma = \frac{{V\varepsilon _0 }}{d}[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



Plugging in numbers, I get 8.5*10-8C/m2. But I never used the Area. My units seem to work. Did they throw in irrelavant data? Shouldn't I only need Area if I want total charge?

Should my answer be half of what I computed, because it is divided between 2 plates?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As far as I'm concerned your solution is correct. As you correctly point out, one only needs the area to calculate the total charge on each plate. Further, you do not need to halve your answer since the surface charge density is calculated for each plate. You can check your solution by placing a Gaussian surface around one plate. Perhaps http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/elesht.html#c2" would be helpful.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks for the feedback and the link!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
6K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K