Parallel-plate capacitor: Two dielectric materials

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the capacitance of a parallel-plate capacitor filled with two different dielectric materials. The left half has a dielectric constant K1 = 7.00 and the right half has K2 = 12.0, with an area A = 5.56 cm² and separation d = 5.56 mm. The correct approach is to treat the two halves as capacitors in parallel, leading to a total capacitance of C_tot = 8.41 pF, as opposed to the incorrect serial calculation initially attempted by the user.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of parallel-plate capacitor equations
  • Familiarity with dielectric constants and their impact on capacitance
  • Knowledge of series and parallel capacitor configurations
  • Basic proficiency in electrical engineering concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the capacitance formula C = κε₀A/d
  • Learn about the effects of different dielectric materials on capacitance
  • Explore the differences between capacitors in series and parallel
  • Investigate practical applications of capacitors in electronic circuits
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineering students, educators, and professionals seeking to deepen their understanding of capacitor configurations and dielectric materials in circuit design.

phyzmatix
Messages
313
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Parallel-plate capacitor: Two dielectric materials

Homework Statement



A parallel-plate capacitor with area A = 5.56 cm^2 and separation d = 5.56 mm has the left half of the gap filled with material of dielectric constant K1 = 7.00 and the right half filled with material of dielectric constant K2 = 12.0. What is the capacitance?


Homework Equations



C = \frac{\kappa \epsilon_{0} A}{d}

\frac {1}{C_{tot}} = \frac {1}{C_{left}} + \frac {1}{C_{right}}

The Attempt at a Solution



Since it's one capacitor (two plates) and since the dielectric materials are next to each other (as opposed to stacked) I approached the problem as if the two halves of the capacitor were separate parallel capacitors and calculated:

C_{left} = 3.10 pF
C_{right} = 5.31 pF

C_{tot} = 1.96 pF

But this is not amongst the given possible answers. Where did I go wrong?

Cheers

phyz
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a serial connection of capacitors so you must add right and left halves capacity:
C=C_{right}+C_{left}
 
Last edited:
Thanks for your reply...however, could you please explain why this setup acts as capacitors in series?
 
I apologize to bad equation C=C_{1}+C_{2}
It's wrong... You have a good solution, because
V=\frac{q}{C}
and V_{1}=\frac{q}{C_{1}} V_{2}=\frac{q}{C_{2}}
and V=V_{1}+V_{2}
so \frac{1}{C}=\frac{1}{C_{1}}+\frac{1}{C_{2}}
 
But this is not amongst the given possible answers.

I appreciate your attempt at helping me Phizyk, but unfortunately we're no closer to understanding this problem than before...
 
phyzmatix said:
C_{left} = 3.10 pF
C_{right} = 5.31 pF

Hi phyzmatix! :smile:

Thanks for the PM …

Did you divide by 2 instead of multiply?
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi phyzmatix! :smile:

Thanks for the PM …

Did you divide by 2 instead of multiply?

Thanks for joining me here tiny-tim :smile:

Yes, I divided the total area given by 2 (I wish I had the means to show you the figure given with the question, on the figure they show that the left side is A/2 and the right side is also A/2)

So my understanding is that the left half of the parallel-plate capacitor has capacitance C_{left} (calculated with K1 and A/2) and the right half has capacitance C_{right} (calculated with K2 and A/2) but how to combine the two values into C_{tot}?

(I'm not sure my assumption that the two can be treated as separate parallel capacitors is correct)
 
Hi phyzmatix! :smile:

Well, they're side-by-side, not one-after-the-other, so they're "in parallel" rather than "in series" (plus, the question calls it a parallel-plate capacitor), so I think you just add them.

Isn't 8.41 one of the given answers?

(if not, what are the given answers? :wink:)
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi phyzmatix! :smile:

Well, they're side-by-side, not one-after-the-other, so they're "in parallel" rather than "in series" (plus, the question calls it a parallel-plate capacitor), so I think you just add them.

Isn't 8.41 one of the given answers?

(if not, what are the given answers? :wink:)

*DOH!*

I feel like such a tw@t :redface:

No wonder I didn't get the right answer, I was using the equation for capacitors in series...

*banging head against wall*

Cheers Tim! You legend! :biggrin:

(oh, by the by, 8.41 is indeed amongst the possibilities :wink:)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
746
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K