Parallel/Series Combination Circuits

Click For Summary
In the discussion about the circuit configuration, participants confirm that resistor R3 is in parallel with resistor R2, as indicated by multiple current paths between them. The equivalent resistance (Req) can be calculated using the sum of the reciprocals of R2 and R3, followed by adding the resistance of R1 in series. Clarification was sought regarding the circuit's structure, but it was affirmed that the initial assumptions were accurate. Overall, the conversation emphasizes understanding the relationship between resistors in parallel and series configurations. This reinforces the importance of visualizing current flow to determine circuit arrangements accurately.
N2L48
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I understand the concepts of whether a resistor is in parallel or in series with each other. But I thought of a weird case that i can't seem to find examples for.

http://imgur.com/b2YMOnAIn this case, would R3 be in parallel or in series to R2? Or could this just be an impossible case?

Thanks in advance
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
N2L48 said:
I understand the concepts of whether a resistor is in parallel or in series with each other. But I thought of a weird case that i can't seem to find examples for.

Can you do this circuit?

attachment.php?attachmentid=58292&stc=1&d=1367133626.png


How does it differ from yours?
 

Attachments

  • circuit2.png
    circuit2.png
    1.8 KB · Views: 550
willem2 said:
Can you do this circuit?

attachment.php?attachmentid=58292&stc=1&d=1367133626.png


How does it differ from yours?

Thanks for the reply.

For that circuit, R3 and R2 would be parallel, so it would be the sum of the reciprocals of R2 and R3. Afterwards, R3+2 will be in series to R1 (Sum of both will give the Req).

My initial assumption was that the circuit I posted was the same as the one you posted, that R3 is parallel to R2, since there's more than 1 flow from R3 to R2. However I read something that confused me, and I just wanted to verify if my assumption was correct.
 
N2L48 said:
Thanks for the reply.

For that circuit, R3 and R2 would be parallel, so it would be the sum of the reciprocals of R2 and R3. Afterwards, R3+2 will be in series to R1 (Sum of both will give the Req).

My initial assumption was that the circuit I posted was the same as the one you posted, that R3 is parallel to R2, since there's more than 1 flow from R3 to R2. However I read something that confused me, and I just wanted to verify if my assumption was correct.

Yes, you're assumption was correct, and the 2 circuits are identical.
 
Topic about reference frames, center of rotation, postion of origin etc Comoving ref. frame is frame that is attached to moving object, does that mean, in that frame translation and rotation of object is zero, because origin and axes(x,y,z) are fixed to object? Is it same if you place origin of frame at object center of mass or at object tail? What type of comoving frame exist? What is lab frame? If we talk about center of rotation do we always need to specified from what frame we observe?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
788
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K