Parallel Spacetimes: Matter & Antimatter Separated?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of parallel spacetimes, specifically the idea of separating matter and antimatter by a void. Participants assert that mainstream scientific theories do not support this notion, emphasizing that spacetime is a 4-dimensional manifold that cannot exist parallel to anything or within a void. Furthermore, spacetime is inherently curved, and matter and antimatter exist within this framework rather than as separate entities. The conversation highlights the need for clarity and grounding in established scientific principles.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of 4-dimensional manifolds in physics
  • Familiarity with the curvature of spacetime
  • Knowledge of matter and antimatter concepts
  • Awareness of mainstream scientific theories in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of 4-dimensional manifolds in general relativity
  • Explore the implications of spacetime curvature on physical theories
  • Study the relationship between matter, antimatter, and spacetime
  • Investigate mainstream physics theories regarding the nature of spacetime
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of theoretical physics, and anyone interested in the fundamental nature of spacetime and its relationship with matter and antimatter.

Chris W Kullander
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Is it possible for two plains of parallel spacetime to exist separated by some sort of void? One being antimatter and one being matter with the void bringing neutral territory. Like a piece of paper between two big magnets.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
No, not in any mainstream theories that are used by professional scientists. Spacetime is a 4-dimensional manifold that doesn't exist inside of anything else, so it can't be parallel to anything (nor is it inside a 'void'). Not only that, but spacetime is not flat, it is curved, so I don't think it could be parallel anyways. It's also not made up of matter or antimatter. Both of these exist 'on top of' or 'inside' of spacetime. I put them in quotes because neither word really describes the situation accurately, but it's the best I could come up with.
 
Drakkith said:
No, not in any mainstream theories that are used by professional scientists. Spacetime is a 4-dimensional manifold that doesn't exist inside of anything else, so it can't be parallel to anything (nor is it inside a 'void'). Not only that, but spacetime is not flat, it is curved, so I don't think it could be parallel anyways. It's also not made up of matter or antimatter. Both of these exist 'on top of' or 'inside' of spacetime. I put them in quotes because neither word really describes the situation accurately, but it's the best I could come up with.
what if it wasn't in the void but around it. Like two ply toilet paper ( sorry for the lame example). It can curve and bend in parallel to the other. Each spacetime would have it's own presumed "antimatter and matter" but really it all falls under one or the other. A perfect opposite to the opposing plain of space. A perfect positive, a perfect neutral, and a perfect negative.
 
Chris W Kullander said:
what if it wasn't in the void but around it. Like two ply toilet paper ( sorry for the lame example). It can curve and bend in parallel to the other. Each spacetime would have it's own presumed "antimatter and matter" but really it all falls under one or the other. A perfect opposite to the opposing plain of space. A perfect positive, a perfect neutral, and a perfect negative.

where are you getting this stuff ? or are you just making it up as you go ?
You seem to be just throwing a bunch of thoughts/ideas together and hoping they make sense

you should know that in the real world ... NOTHING is perfect

just read the post from Drakkith again
 
Thread closed temporarily for Moderation...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
@Chris W Kullander -- Your thread will remain closed. If you can find links to mainstream websites about related issues and you want to discuss them, please start a new thread with those links and ask specific questions about the information in the links. Thank you.
 

Similar threads

High School Matter-antimatter asymmetry - a simple explanation?
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
High School Why do we assume the big bang created matter/antimatter?
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
High School Question about time and its relation to spacetime
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
28K
Undergrad Superconductors and spacetime question
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
My inspirational epic -- Enjoy, correct and criticize to your heart's content
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Undergrad Question of accuracy of galactic collision simulations
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
Undergrad Is the CPT-Symmetric Universe Theory the Key to Solving the Antimatter Mystery?
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Graduate Overall perturbation for two free-falling particles in flat spacetime
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
Undergrad Uncover Traps in Spacetime Diagrams: Bob & Alice's Cases
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
Graduate Why not an equal amount of matter and antimatter in the universe?
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K