MHB Parallelogram on graph problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the length of segments in a parallelogram using geometric calculations rather than guesswork. The length of segment AD is calculated to be 50, while segment AB is expressed in terms of k, resulting in the formula for its length as √(k² + 400). Segment BD is similarly derived, leading to the application of Heron's Formula to find the area of triangle ABD. By setting the area of the parallelogram to 1340, the value of k is determined to be 18, identifying point B at (18, 50) and point C at (58, 20). The approach emphasizes systematic calculation over trial and error.
Ilikebugs
Messages
94
Reaction score
0
View attachment 6377

Is there a way to do this other than guess and check?
 

Attachments

  • tri 2.png
    tri 2.png
    13.7 KB · Views: 108
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Ilikebugs said:
Is there a way to do this other than guess and check?

The length of segment AD is $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \sqrt{ \left( 40 - 0 \right) ^2 + \left( 0 - 30 \right) ^2 } = \sqrt{1600 + 900} = \sqrt{2500} = 50 \end{align*}$.

The length of segment AB is $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \sqrt{ \left( k - 0 \right) ^2 + \left( 50 - 30 \right) ^2 } = \sqrt{ k^2 + 400 } \end{align*}$.

The length of segment BD is $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \sqrt{ \left( 40 - k \right) ^2 + \left( 0 - 50 \right) ^2 } = \sqrt{ 1600 - 80\,k + k^2 + 2500 } = \sqrt{ k^2 - 80\,k + 4100 } \end{align*}$.

Thus the area of triangle ABD can be found using Heron's Formula and the length of the parallelogram is double that. Then you can set this quantity equal to 1340 and solve for k.
 
$$\left|\vec{AB}\times\vec{AD}\right|=1340\implies k=18,\quad B(x,y)=(18,50)$$

$$\vec{AB}+\vec{AD}=\vec{AC}\implies C(x,y)=(58,20)$$
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top