Parametric equations for a line

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the parametric equations for a line and the equation of a tangent plane at point P=(1,1,1) on the surface defined by 25x^2 + 25y^2 + 4z^2 = 54. The parametric equations for the line are established as x=1+50t, y=1+50t, and z=1+8t, with the normal vector to the surface identified as <50, 50, 8>. To find the tangent plane, the equation is formulated using the normal vector and point P, resulting in 50(x-1) + 50(y-1) + 8(z-1) = 0. The discussion emphasizes the relationship between the coefficients of the surface equation and the normal vector, clarifying that the normal vector is derived from the gradient of the function defining the surface.
UrbanXrisis
Messages
1,192
Reaction score
1
considering the surface 25x^2+25y^2+4z^2=54

The parametric equation for a line going thought point P=(1,1,1) is

x=1+50t
y=1+50t
z=1+8t

A plane an equation for the tangent plane through P.

Here's what I know:
the equation for a plane needs a perpendicular vector to the plane and a point on the plane. I have a point on the place P=(1,1,1) but how do I find the perpendicular vector? I have a line ON the plane, what can I do to get an equation that is perpendicular to the plane?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Im struggling with these concepts as well.. but I think your perp. vector is <25,25,4>. Simply the coefficients of teh surface equation.

I wonder why these coefficients is the perp. and I asked my teacher. All he could tell me was its a way to describe the plane. So I have no idea why the coefficients are the perp. vector, they simply are.
 
Commie, you can only say that when the equation is already actually a plane, which is not what his equation is. the reason for it is that given a point P on the plane and normal vector N, the plane is the set of points Q such that (Q - P).N = 0, or in other words the set of points Q such that the line between Q and P is perpendicular to the normal vector (makes sense?). The coefficients are then derived from Q.N: the coefficients of q1, q2, q3 are n1, n2, n3, which is just N.

Urban, you can find two vectors parallel to your plane--think partial derivatives. Now given two vectors, what operation can you do to get a vector perpendicular to those two vectors?
 
Here's the way I like to do it:
Define F(x,y,z)= 25x^2+25y^2+4z^2 so your surface is a level surface of F: F(x,y,z)= 54. The derivative of F in the direction of any unit vector, u is \nabla F\cdot v. In particular, if u is a vector tangent to the level surface, since F does not change in that direction, \nabla F\cdot v= 0. That is \nabla F, at a point, is perpendicular to any level surface of containing that point.

In this case, \nabla F= 50x i+ 50y j+ 8z, evaluated at (1, 1, 1) is \nabla F(1,1,1)= 50 i+ 50 j+ 8z. Parametric equations for the normal line to the surface at that point (not just "a" line) are
x= 1+ 50t, y= 1+ 50t, z= 1+ 8t.

Since that vector must also be perpendicular to the tangent plane at that point, an equation for the tangent plane is 50(x-1)+ 50(y-1)+ 8(z-1)= 0 or 50x+ 50y+ 8z= 108.

I wonder why these coefficients is the perp. and I asked my teacher. All he could tell me was its a way to describe the plane. So I have no idea why the coefficients are the perp. vector, they simply are.
Commie, an equation of a plane containing the point (a, b, c) and having normal vector Ai+ Bj+ Ck is A(x- a)+ B(y- b)+ C(z- c)= 0. To see why, think of it as a dot product:
A(x- a)+ B(y- b)+ C(z- c)= (Ai+ Bj+ Ck)\cdot((x-a)i+ (y-b)j+ (z-c)k).
Since (a,b,c) and (x,y,z) are both in the plane, the vector (x-a)i+ (y-b)j+ (z-c)k is in the plane. It's dot product, for any (x,y,z) in the plane, with Ai+ Bj+ Ck is 0 if and only if Ai+ Bj+ Ck is perpendicular to the plane.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K