Parametric representation of a vector electric field

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the parametric representation of a vector electric field, with participants examining the relationships between various components and their mathematical expressions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the correctness of certain expressions and whether assumptions about variables are valid. There is an exploration of the implications of typos and the simplification of equations.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered corrections and clarifications regarding the expressions used, while others are checking their work against these insights. The conversation reflects a collaborative effort to clarify misunderstandings and refine the approach to the problem.

Contextual Notes

There are mentions of potential typos in the original equations, which may affect the interpretation of the problem. Participants are also navigating the implications of scalar versus vector equations in their discussions.

jjand
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



See Attachment

Homework Equations



None I can think of

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm fairly certain that phi_yx is zero
Also I tried factoring out the cos and splitting up the equation into it's respective components, but to no avail. Am I even going about this correctly?
 

Attachments

  • Screen shot 2011-10-23 at 3.35.20 AM.png
    Screen shot 2011-10-23 at 3.35.20 AM.png
    12.5 KB · Views: 535
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The last bit is a typo. It should be [itex]\phi_{xy} = \phi_x[/itex].

I'm not sure what you mean by "splitting up the equation into its respective components" since the equation you're supposed to show is true is a scalar equation.
 
Thanks for the reply Vela! Actually I think I figured it out. Maybe you or someone else can check my work? I assumed that it the phi's were not typos, but they could very well be. I went ahead and attached my work.
 

Attachments

Your expressions for Ex and Ey are slightly wrong. For example,
[tex]E_x = A_x\cos(kz-\omega t+\phi_x) = A_x\cos(-r+\phi_x) = A_x\cos(r-\phi_x)[/tex]since cosine is an even function. You have an extra negative signs floating around.

You must have made a mistake somewhere in the middle because the cross term has the wrong sign. The sign doesn't flip the way you did it because, again, [itex]\cos (-\theta)=\cos\theta[/itex].

You actually made it more complicated by keeping the E's and A's around. You know that
\begin{align*}
\frac{E_x}{A_x} &= \cos(\phi_x-r) \\
\frac{E_y}{A_y} &= \cos(r) \\
\end{align*}so you could have just written the lefthand side in terms of cosines and then shown it simplifies down to the righthand side.
 
Ah that I forgot about that cosine property and I found a convenient sign mistake half way through the problem. Thanks Vela!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K