Parametrised Circle Trajectory: Particle in x≤0 Half-Plane

  • Thread starter Thread starter Poetria
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circle
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the parametrization of a particle's trajectory, specifically a semi-circle in the x≤0 half-plane. Participants explore different parametrizations of the unit circle and their implications on the direction of motion.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the differences between various parametrizations of the unit circle, questioning the implications of directionality and the specific constraints of the problem. There are inquiries about the correctness of answers and the underlying assumptions regarding the trajectory's location.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes attempts to clarify the nature of the parametrizations and their respective paths. Some participants express confusion about their answers, while others point out the need for more information regarding the original question to provide better guidance. There is an acknowledgment of differing interpretations of the problem's setup.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the trajectory's description may have multiple interpretations, leading to confusion about the correct parametrization and the specific half-plane in question. There is a mention of various options available in the problem, indicating potential ambiguity in the setup.

Poetria
Messages
267
Reaction score
42
Homework Statement
There is a unit circle, where x(t)=sin(t), y(t)=cos(t)
0≤t<pi
Relevant Equations
x^2+y^2=1
The trajectory of a particle is a semi-circle contained in the x≤0 half-plane.

Well, this is somewhat weird. I have come across examples with x(t)=cos(t), y(t)=sin(t) and not the other way round.
By the way, my answer is wrong but I don't know why. This is probably silly. :(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Those parametrizations are just different parametrizations of the unit circle.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Poetria
Those are actually different paths going in different directions. For ##t \in (0,\pi)##, (cos(t),sin(t)) stays in the upper half-plane and goes counter-clockwise from (1,0) to (-1,0). The counter-clockwise, starting at (1,0), parameterization occurs often in complex analysis and elsewhere, but usually goes all the way around the circle.
(sin(t),cos(t)) stays in the right half-plane, starts at (0,1) and goes in a clockwise direction to (0,-1). That is an unusual parameterization.
When line integrals are studied, the correct direction of the path is critical. And the ends of the paths are always critical.
 
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: Poetria
Orodruin said:
Those parametrizations are just different parametrizations of the unit circle.
Ok, I got it. Many thanks. But why is my answer wrong then? :rolleyes:
 
Great, I understand everything now. Many thanks. 😍
 
Poetria said:
Ok, I got it. Many thanks. But why is my answer wrong then? :rolleyes:
Hard to say because you never told us what the question actually was!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Poetria
"The trajectory of a particle is a semi-circle contained in the x≤0 half-plane." - this one is wrong. There were several options in this problem.
The right one: The trajectory of a particle is a semi-circle contained in the x≥0 half-plane.

Thank you very much. I know this is easy but I was confused.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: benorin and Delta2

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
9K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
778