Parametrizing and Evaluating a Line Integral on a Given Curve

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves evaluating a line integral of the form ∫(x^3 + y^3)ds along a specified curve defined by the parametrization r(t) = for t in the range [0, ln(2)]. Participants are exploring different methods of setting up and solving the integral.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to parametrize the integral and expresses concerns about the complexity of the resulting integral. Some participants question whether there are alternative forms or methods that could simplify the evaluation, including the use of hyperbolic functions and differential forms.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively discussing various approaches to the integral, including rewriting the curve and exploring different parametrizations. There is no explicit consensus on the best method, and some participants express uncertainty about the complexity of the integral.

Contextual Notes

Some participants mention the use of computational tools like Maple and Wolfram Alpha to verify results, indicating that the integral may yield complex expressions. The discussion also touches on the potential for rewriting the integral in terms of different variables or forms, but no definitive simplification has been agreed upon.

meson0731
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Evaluate ∫(x^3 + y^3)ds where C : r(t)=<e^t , e^(-t)>, 0 <= t <= ln2
c


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I tried to parametrize the integral and change ds to sqrt(e^(2t) + e^(-2t)) dt.

I then change (x^3 + y^3) to (e^(3t) + e^(-3t)

so i ended up with


ln2
∫(e^(3t) + e^(-3t)) * sqrt(e^(2t) + e^(-2t))dt
0

I feel like i set the integral up wrong because I would have no idea of how to do this integral. Even wolframalpha gives me a crazy answer. Is there another way to do this or did i make a mistake?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks correct to me. For what it's worth, Maple gives:$$
\frac 1 8\ln \left( \frac{13\sqrt{17}+51}{13\sqrt{17}-51}\right)+\frac{63\sqrt{17}}{64}$$
 
So i have to actually do that integral? Is there a way to write it in differential form or another form that would be easier?
 
meson0731 said:
So i have to actually do that integral? Is there a way to write it in differential form or another form that would be easier?

Beats me. I don't right off see a simple way to work it myself. I thought about expressing the integrand in terms of ##\cosh(3t)## and ##\cosh(2t)## and I still didn't see anything obvious. But then again, I haven't been losing any sleep over it and maybe someone else will see something clever.
 
Yeah i tried changing it into hyperbolic but it just got even more messy...
 
It may help to rewrite the curve that it travels over.
Instead of integrating $$r(t)=<e^t,e^{-t}>$$ it may be easier to integrate $$r(t)=<t,\frac{1}{t}>$$

It haven't tried it though, so it may not be any easier.
 
I'm working on this same problem. I did indeed rewrite it as r(t)=<t,1/t>, but this integral is no easier to solve. The solution given by Wolfram Alpha for this integral was the same numerically as that given by Maple in the above post.
 
I haven't evaluated many line integrals, but if we are on the curve y = 1/x, can't we skip using the parameter t and integrate [itex](x^3 + \frac{1}{x^3})\sqrt{1 + \frac{1}{x^4}} dx[/itex]
from 1 to 2?
I'm having success evaluating it using the substitution [itex]x^2 = tan\theta[/itex].
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
12K