Paricles in crossed electric and magnetic field

In summary, an electron and a positron are moving in the +x-direction with the same velocity in a crossed electric and magnetic field. The question states it's impossible to separate them using this configuration. Taking the +y-direction as positive for the electric field and vB, I get this: F_e = -e(E-vB) = e(-E+vB) (force on electron) F_p = e(-E-vB) (force on positron) However, this gives that the magnetic force on the electron and positron are in the same direction as the electric force, which means they would separate? But they are not supposed to.f
  • #1
16
0
An electron and a positron are moving in the +x-direction with the same velocity in a crossed electric and magnetic field (the fields are perpendicular). The question states it's impossible to separate them using this configuration.

The electric field is pointing in the -y-direction and the magnetic field, out of the page (+z-direction). Taking the +y-direction as positive for the electric field and [itex]vB[/itex], I get this:

[itex]F_e = -e(E-vB) = e(-E+vB) [/itex] (force on electron)
[itex]F_p = e(-E-vB)[/itex] (force on positron)

The cross product between the velocity (in the +x-direction) and the magnetic field (+z-direction) points the same for the electron and the positron (I think), -y-direction.

As you can see [itex]F_e[/itex] and [itex]F_p[/itex] are not equal, so the particles would be separated, which is not supposed to be possible.

But I just cannot find where I go wrong.

Thank you!
 
  • #2
Why is there a minus sign for the positron E field magnitude and not for the electron E field?
How did you account for the attractive force between the positron and the electron?
 
  • #3
Fe=−e(EvB)=e(−E+vB)F_e = -e(E-vB) = e(-E+vB) (force on electron)
Fp=e(−EvB)F_p = e(-E-vB) (force on positron)

Why do you have -E in the force on the positron?

For a given E field, the forces on an electron and a positron should be in opposite directions.
 
  • #4
Why do you have -E in the force on the positron?

For a given E field, the forces on an electron and a positron should be in opposite directions.

I agree, the E-field should have the same sign, in this situation I defined the minus y-direction as negative. I get:

[itex] Fe=−e(-E−vB) = e(E+vB) [/itex]
[itex]Fp=e(-E−vB) [/itex]

Supposedly (according to the question) you need not consider the attraction between the electron and the positron, just the Lorentz's Force to show this.

However, this gives that the magnetic force on the electron and positron are in the same direction as the electric force, which means they would separate? But they are not supposed to.
 
  • #5
Oh now I get you!
Lets see - electric field is ##\vec E = -E\hat\jmath##, the magnetic field is ##\vec B = B\hat k##, and the velocity is ##\vec v = v\hat\imath##

Check my reasoning...
For an arbitrary charge q:
##\vec F = q\big[-E\hat\jmath + vB(\hat\imath \times \hat k = -\hat j)\big] = q(-E - vB )\hat\jmath##

For the particle to maintain a straight line path, ##E+ vB=0## ... if you fix the electric field and adjust the magnet, you see that it has to be ##B=-E/v < 0##
i.e. the magnetic field needs to point the other way; well done.

Is this in the context of a CRT experiment?
 

Suggested for: Paricles in crossed electric and magnetic field

Replies
5
Views
555
Replies
3
Views
67
Replies
8
Views
770
Replies
5
Views
541
Replies
1
Views
588
Back
Top