Parseval's Relation w/ Fourier Transform

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on applying Parseval's Theorem to the Fourier transform of the function f(t) = e^{-a|t|}. The user expresses confusion regarding the correct form of the Fourier transform and the integration process, particularly about the presence of the factor 2a. Clarifications are provided about the proper application of Parseval's Theorem, emphasizing the need for the correct normalization factor of 2π in the integral expressions. The user ultimately confirms they arrived at a solution consistent with Wolfram Alpha, noting the importance of including the normalization factor in future calculations. The conversation highlights common pitfalls in applying Fourier analysis and the significance of adhering to standard conventions.
xago
Messages
60
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



[PLAIN]http://img600.imageshack.us/img600/161/parcq.png

Homework Equations



Parseval's Theorem using FT's for this is ∫^{\infty}_{-\infty} |f(t)|^{2}dx = ∫^{\infty}_{-\infty} |\tilde{f}(w)|^{2}dw

The Attempt at a Solution



From what I know, the Fourier transform of f(t) = e^{-a|t|} is \tilde{f} (w) = \frac{2a}{w^{2}+a^{2}}

So for my answer I would simply evaluate ∫^{\infty}_{-\infty} |f(t)|^{2}dx for f(t) = e^{-a|t|}

However in the question there is no "2a" term on the top so I'm confused as how to proceed
|\tilde{f}(w)|^{2} does not equal \frac{dw}{w^{2}+a^{2}} as given in the question where \tilde{f} (w) = \frac{2a}{w^{2}+a^{2}}
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
So, you need to integrate:
<br /> \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}{e^{-2 a |t|} \, dt}<br />
Parseval's Theorem guarantees that this integral (provided that f(t) = e^{-a |t|} is truly the inverse Fourier transform of (\omega^2 + a^2)^{-1}) is the same as the integral you are supposed to calculate.

Then, split the limits of integration so that you get rid of the absolute value sign and do the integrals. They are table.
 
Last edited:
But the Fourier Transform of f(t) = e^{-a|t|} is \tilde{f} (w) = \frac{2a}{w^{2}+2a^{2}} and not \frac{1}{w^{2}+a^{2}} so i don't understand how you can say ∫^{\infty}_{-\infty} |f(t)|^{2}dx = ∫^{\infty}_{-\infty} |\tilde{f}(w)|^{2}dw when |f(t)|^{2} = e^{-2a|t|} and |f(w)|^{2} = (\frac{2a}{w^{2}+a^{2}})^{2}

Basically it says evaluate ∫^{\infty}_{-\infty} \frac{dw}{w^{2}+a^{2}} and not ∫^{\infty}_{-\infty} \frac{2a}{w^{2}+a^{2}}dw
 
Last edited:
Can anyone shed some light on this?
 
Hint:
\frac{1}{\omega^2+a^2} = \frac{1}{2a}\left(\frac{2a}{\omega^2+a^2}\right)
 
Hmm :S , so is it just as simple as evaluating \frac{1}{2a}∫^{\infty}_{-\infty} e^{-2a|t|}dt ?
 
no. Because you need |f(t)|^2 in the integral.
 
oops

∫^{\infty}_{-\infty} (\frac{e^{-a|t|}}{2a})^{2}dt

=\frac{1}{4a^{2}}∫^{\infty}_{-\infty} e^{-2a|t|}dt
?
 
Yes.
 
  • #10
BTW, methods of contour integration should give the result:
<br /> 2 \pi i \lim_{z \rightarrow i a}{\frac{d}{dz} \left( \frac{1}{(z + i a)^2}\right)}<br />

and Wolfram Alpha gives the following value for the integral:
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=Integrate[1/(x^2+a^2)^2,{x,-Infinity,Infinity}]"

EDIT:
Also, your Parseval's Theorem is wrong. It should be:
<br /> \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}{\vert f(t) \vert^2 \, dt} = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}{\vert \tilde{F}(\omega) \vert^2 \, \frac{d \omega}{2 \pi}}<br />
(there's a factor of 2 pi missing in your definition), PROVIDED THAT, your Fourier transform is:
<br /> \tilde{F}(\omega) = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}{f(t) \, e^{i \omega t} \, dt}<br />
and the inverse Fourier transform is:
<br /> f(t) = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}{\tilde{F}(\omega) e^{-i \omega t} \, \frac{d \omega}{2 \pi}}<br />

This convention is standard in Physics, but not in EE. See if your function and Fourier transform satisfy these.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #11
Well I ended up getting \frac{1}{4a^{3}} which is the same as the Wolfram Alpha solution minus the factor of 2\pi, so Ill include that in my FT's this time. Thanks for your help!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K