Partial Derivative, piecewise function

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the partial derivatives of a piecewise function defined as f(x,y) = (xy(x^2 - y^2))/(x^2 + y^2)^2 for (x,y) ≠ (0,0) and f(0,0) = 0. Participants are tasked with evaluating f_{xx}(0,0), f_{xy}(0,0), and f_{yx}(0,0).

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Some participants express uncertainty about handling the piecewise nature of the function, particularly at the point (0,0). Others attempt to compute the first and second partial derivatives but struggle with evaluating them at (0,0).
  • One participant questions whether the function is truly piecewise and suggests that f(0,0) is defined to ensure continuity and differentiability.
  • Another participant shares a similar problem and raises concerns about the equality of mixed partial derivatives, seeking clarification on how to approach the limits involved.
  • There are discussions about the definitions of partial derivatives and how to apply them at the origin, with some participants proposing specific limits to evaluate the derivatives.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring various interpretations and approaches to the problem. Some guidance has been offered regarding the definitions of partial derivatives and the continuity of the function, but no consensus has been reached on the specific evaluations at (0,0).

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenge of evaluating limits that result in indeterminate forms, particularly at the origin, and the implications of the piecewise definition on continuity and differentiability.

Thomas_
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let :
[tex]f(x,y) = \frac{xy(x^2 - y^2)}{(x^2 + y^2)^2}[/tex] if [tex](x,y) \neq (0,0)[/tex]
[tex]f(x,y) = 0[/tex] if [tex](x,y) = (0,0)[/tex]

a) Find [tex]f_{xx}(0,0)[/tex]

b) Find [tex]f_{xy}(0,0)[/tex]

c) Find [tex]f_{yx}(0,0)[/tex]

Homework Equations


None

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm not sure how to deal with the piecewise defined function, I just took the first and second partial derivatives w/ respect to x (for part a), but then still I can't evaluate the resulting function at (0,0), because at the point it doesn't exist...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thomas_ said:

Homework Statement


Let :
[tex]f(x,y) = \frac{xy(x^2 - y^2)}{(x^2 + y^2)^2}[/tex] if [tex](x,y) \neq (0,0)[/tex]
[tex]f(x,y) = 0[/tex] if [tex](x,y) = (0,0)[/tex]

a) Find [tex]f_{xx}(0,0)[/tex]

b) Find [tex]f_{xy}(0,0)[/tex]

c) Find [tex]f_{yx}(0,0)[/tex]

Homework Equations


None

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm not sure how to deal with the piecewise defined function, I just took the first and second partial derivatives w/ respect to x (for part a), but then still I can't evaluate the resulting function at (0,0), because at the point it doesn't exist...

We can't tell whether what you got is correct because you didn't tell us what you got.
 
That's not really piecewise. f(0, 0) is defined to be 0 in order to make f continuous and so differentiable. You can do the entire problem just ignoring f(0,0).
 
I have exactly the same question. The equation is even more or less the same. Mine is:

[tex]f(x,y)=\frac{xy(x^2-y^2)}{x^2+y^2}[/tex] if [tex](x,y) \neq (0,0)[/tex]
[tex]f(x,y)=0[/tex] if [tex](x,y)=(0,0)[/tex].

But I'm still puzzled how to threat the point (0,0). According to my textbook, [tex]f_{xy}(0,0)\neq f_{yx}(0,0)[/tex]. So, I know more or less the solution, but I'm not sure that my explanation is correct.

Ignoring the point (0,0) I have:

first x, then y:
[tex]\frac{\partial{f}}{\partial{x}}(x,y)=\frac{-y^5+yx^4+4y^3x^2}{(x^2+y^2)^2}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{\partial{f}}{\partial{y}\partial{x}}(x,y)=\frac{x^6+9x^4y^2-9x^2y^4-y^6}{(x^2+y^2)^3}[/tex]

first y, then x:
[tex]\frac{\partial{f}}{\partial{y}}(x,y)=\frac{x^5-4x^3y^2-y^4x}{(x^2+y^2)^2}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{\partial{f}}{\partial{x}\partial{y}}(x,y)=\frac{x^6+9x^4y^2-9x^2y^4-y^6}{(x^2+y^2)^3}[/tex]

So, it is obvious that as long [tex]x\neq 0[/tex] and [tex]y\neq 0[/tex] that [tex]\frac{\partial{f}}{\partial{y}\partial{x}}(x,y)=\frac{\partial{f}}{\partial{x}\partial{y}}(x,y)[/tex].

Now, for (x,y)->(0,0), how do I prove that
[tex]\frac{\partial{f}}{\partial{y}\partial{x}}(0,0)\neq\frac{\partial{f}}{\partial{x}\partial{y}}(0,0)[/tex]? Clearly, just substituting x and y with 0 results in [tex]\frac{0}{0}[/tex].

Is it valid to say the following:
For[tex]\frac{\partial{f}}{\partial{y}\partial{x}}(0,0)[/tex], first let x-> 0 first, resulting in [tex]\frac{\partial{f}}{\partial{y}\partial{x}}(0,y)=\frac{-y^6}{y^6}=-1, \forall y[/tex] and thus[tex]\frac{\partial{f}}{\partial{y}\partial{x}}(0,0)=-1[/tex]?

For[tex]\frac{\partial{f}}{\partial{x}\partial{y}}(0,0)[/tex], first let y-> 0 first, resulting in [tex]\frac{\partial{f}}{\partial{x}\partial{y}}(x,0)=\frac{x^6}{x^6}=1, \forall x[/tex] and thus[tex]\frac{\partial{f}}{\partial{x}\partial{y}}(0,0)=1[/tex]?

This is more or less a guess. I have no clue whether it is correct and if it is correct how to justify this. Especially, I have no explanation why for [tex]\frac{\partial{f}}{\partial{y}\partial{x}}(0,0)[/tex], I first let x->0 and not y->0.

Any help on this would be most welcome and will be highly appreciated.

(and happy new year to you all)
 
The partial derivatives are defined by the limits
[tex]f_x(x_0,y_0)= \lim_{h\rightarrow 0} \frac{f(x_0+h, y_0)- f(x_0,y_0)}{h}[/tex]
and
[tex]f_y(x_0,y_0)= \lim_{h\rightarrow 0} \frac{f(x_0,y_0+h)- f(x_0,y_0)}{h}[/tex]
Here, [itex](x_0,y_0)= (0,0)[/itex] and with h non-zero, in calculating the limit, we are not at (0,0) and so use the other formula.

Here,
[tex]f_x(0,0)= \lim_{h\rightarrow 0} \frac{\frac{(x+h)(0)((x+h)^2- 0^2)}{(x+h)^2- 0^2)- 0}}{h}= \lim_{h\rightarrow 0} 0/h= 0[/itex] <br /> [tex]f_y(0,0)= \lim_{h\rightarrow 0} \frac{\frac{(0)(y+h)(0^2- (y+h)^2)}{0^2-(y+h)^2- 0}}{h}= \lim_{h\rightarrow 0} 0/h= 0[/itex]<br /> While [itex]f_x[/itex] and [itex]f_y[/itex] for (x,y) not equal to (0,0) is given by differentiating f in the usual way.<br /> <br /> Once you know [itex]f_x[/itex] and [itex]f_y[/itex] for (x,y) close to (0,0) do exactly the same thing with this new function to find the second derivative.[/tex][/tex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K