Partial derivatives of implicitly defined functions

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves finding the second partial derivative of t with respect to y, given two equations that implicitly define s and t as functions of x and y. The equations are complex and involve multiple variables, leading to questions about the differentiation process.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the differentiation of terms involving multiple variables and question how to derive partial derivatives when functions are interdependent. There are attempts to differentiate each equation with respect to y and to isolate the derivatives of t and s.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively exploring different methods of differentiation and discussing the implications of their approaches. Some guidance has been offered regarding the need to differentiate both sides of the equations, and there is recognition of the challenge in eliminating terms to solve for the desired derivatives.

Contextual Notes

There is a concern about the consistency of results when substituting derived expressions back into the original equations, leading to questions about the uniqueness of the solution.

compliant
Messages
43
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If the equations

[tex]x^2 - 2(y^2)(s^2)t - 2st^2 = 1[/tex]
[tex]x^2 + 2(y^2)(s^2)t + 5st^2 = 1[/tex]

define s and t as functions of x and y, find [tex]\partial^2 t / \partial y^2[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



Equating the two, we get 4y^2*s^2*t = -7s*t^2. My main problem is, as simple as this sounds, how do I implicitly differentiate a single term with three variables? (i.e. 4y^2*s^2*t) Because if I can implicitly differentiate it in terms of y, I can probably find [tex]\partial t / \partial y[/tex] in terms of the other partial derivatives.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Partial differentiation is not implicit differentiation if that's what you mean. You simply treat all other variables as constant. In this case you get 8y*s^2 etc...
 
But how would I get the partial derivative of t wrt y from there? I mean, aren't we assuming t is a function of x and y (and with s as well?) ?So let me try this out:

8y*s^2*t + 4y^2([tex]2 \partial s / \partial y[/tex])t + 4y^2*s^2*([tex]\partial t / \partial y[/tex]) = -7([tex]\partial s / \partial y[/tex])*t^2 - 7s([tex]2 \partial t / \partial y[/tex])
 
compliant said:
But how would I get the partial derivative of t wrt y from there? I mean, aren't we assuming t is a function of x and y (and with s as well?) ?

Don't combine your two original equations; instead differentiate each one with respect to [itex]y[/itex]--- you will end up with two equations, each involving [itex]\frac{\partial s}{\partial y}[/itex] and [itex]\frac{\partial t}{\partial y}[/itex], which you can then solve for [itex]\frac{\partial t}{\partial y}[/itex].
 
gabbagabbahey said:
Don't combine your two original equations; instead differentiate each one with respect to [itex]y[/itex]--- you will end up with two equations, each involving [itex]\frac{\partial s}{\partial y}[/itex] and [itex]\frac{\partial t}{\partial y}[/itex], which you can then solve for [itex]\frac{\partial t}{\partial y}[/itex].

Sounds like a plan. So let me try this again...[-4y[itex]s^2[/itex]t - 2[itex]y^2[/itex]([itex]2s\frac{\partial s}{\partial y})t[/itex] - 2[itex]y^2 s^2[/itex]([itex]\frac{\partial t}{\partial y}[/itex])] + [-2([itex]\frac{\partial s}{\partial y})t^2[/itex] - 2s([itex]2 \frac{\partial t}{\partial y})[/itex]] = 1

[4y[itex]s^2[/itex]t + 2[itex]y^2[/itex]([itex]2s\frac{\partial s}{\partial y})t[/itex] + 2[itex]y^2 s^2[/itex]([itex]\frac{\partial t}{\partial y}[/itex])] + [5([itex]\frac{\partial s}{\partial y})t^2[/itex] + 5s([itex]2 \frac{\partial t}{\partial y})[/itex]] = 1[3([itex]\frac{\partial s}{\partial y})t^2[/itex] + 3s([itex]2 \frac{\partial t}{\partial y})[/itex]] = 2

Is there a way to eliminate the [itex]\frac{\partial s}{\partial y}[/itex] term?
 
compliant said:
Sounds like a plan. So let me try this again...


[-4y[itex]s^2[/itex]t - 2[itex]y^2[/itex]([itex]2s\frac{\partial s}{\partial y})t[/itex] - 2[itex]y^2 s^2[/itex]([itex]\frac{\partial t}{\partial y}[/itex])] + [-2([itex]\frac{\partial s}{\partial y})t^2[/itex] - 2s([itex]2 \frac{\partial t}{\partial y})[/itex]] = 1

[4y[itex]s^2[/itex]t + 2[itex]y^2[/itex]([itex]2s\frac{\partial s}{\partial y})t[/itex] + 2[itex]y^2 s^2[/itex]([itex]\frac{\partial t}{\partial y}[/itex])] + [5([itex]\frac{\partial s}{\partial y})t^2[/itex] + 5s([itex]2 \frac{\partial t}{\partial y})[/itex]] = 1

Careful, when you differentiate an equation, you need to differentiate both sides of it.

[tex]\frac{\partial}{\partial y} (1)\neq 1[/tex]

Is there a way to eliminate the [itex]\frac{\partial s}{\partial y}[/itex] term?

Sure...you have 2 equations and 2 unkowns; think back to your high school algebra :wink:
 
gabbagabbahey said:
Careful, when you differentiate an equation, you need to differentiate both sides of it.

[tex]\frac{\partial}{\partial y} (1)\neq 1[/tex]



Sure...you have 2 equations and 2 unkowns; think back to your high school algebra :wink:

Ok, so now I have

[tex]3t^2 \frac {\partial s}{\partial y} = -6s \frac{\partial t}{\partial y}[/tex]
[tex]\frac {\partial s}{\partial y} = \frac{-2s}{t^2} \frac{\partial t}{\partial y}[/tex]

I sub this back into the first equations to get [itex]\frac{\partial t}{\partial y}[/itex]. However, I get a different value for [itex]\frac{\partial t}{\partial y}[/itex] when I plug it into the second equation. If I'm going to write the answer, would I write them both down? Because I feel there really should only be one answer...
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K