Partial differential (multivariable calculus)

Poetria
Messages
267
Reaction score
42
Homework Statement
Recall that when we take a partial derivative, at a point (a,b), we fix the x-coordinate at a , and differentiate with respect to the y variable.

Which of the following best describes fixing the x-coordinate at the value a?
Relevant Equations
E.g. f(x,y)=x^2+y^2
f(y)= 2*y
Intersecting the graph of the surface z=f(x,y) with the yz -plane.

This is the option I have chosen, but it's wrong. I don't understand why. x is fixed so I thought the coordinates: y and z are left.

I thought this source may be helpful: https://www.whitman.edu/mathematics/calculus_online/section14.03.html
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You fixed the value of ##x## to ##x=0##. Why? You should consider ##g(y)=f(c,y)## with an arbitrary constant ##c##. Now that we are interested in the derivative at ##(x,y)=(a,b)## we get ##c=a##. Your solution is only correct if ##a=0.## E.g. if we have ##f(x,y)=xy^2## then we look for ##g'(y)=(ay^2)'## at ##y=b.## What would we get in the ##y-z-##plane?
 
Well, g'(y)=2*a*y
If y=b, then g'(y)=2*a*b

Is it a line?
So the correct answer is: Intersecting the graph of the surface z=f(x,y) with the plane y=b ?
 
Poetria said:
Well, g'(y)=2*a*y
If y=b, then g'(y)=2*a*b

Is it a line?
So the correct answer is: Intersecting the graph of the surface z=f(x,y) with the plane y=b ?
Are you sure the partial derivative according to ##y## was meant? I'd say we consider the intersection with the plane ##x=a## since we want to know changes in the ##y-##direction with constant ##x=a.## The plane with ##y=b## doesn't change anything in the ##y-##direction.

A partial derivative is only a directional derivative in a coordinate direction, either ##\partial_x## or ##\partial_y.## Evaluating it at ##(a,b)## means to put the origin of the tangent space in ##(a,b)##, but the directions remain the same.
 
I got it. The plane a is parallel to the yz plane.
Many thanks.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top