Partial Fraction Decomposition

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the topic of partial fraction decomposition, specifically focusing on the setup and manipulation of equations involving rational functions. Participants are examining the correct formulation of the right-hand side of an equation in relation to a given left-hand side expression.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to apply the general method for partial fraction decomposition, discussing the setup of the least common denominator (LCD) and the correctness of their expressions. There are questions about the accuracy of the terms on the right-hand side of the equation and whether they align with the left-hand side.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing clarification regarding the formulation of the equation, with some participants pointing out potential misprints and suggesting corrections. The conversation reflects a collaborative effort to ensure the correct setup before proceeding with solving for the coefficients.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working with specific rational expressions and are concerned about the implications of misprints in the problem statement. The discussion highlights the importance of accurately representing all terms in the equation to facilitate proper decomposition.

xxwinexx
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


[PLAIN]http://webwork2.math.utah.edu/webwork2_files/tmp/equations/60/0cff8a5107e21ae393dee5038fb6b31.png


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I've been attempting to use the general method of solving found at this website:
http://www.purplemath.com/modules/partfrac2.htm

Basically it has me multiply out all of the right side using the LCD. After doing that, I plug in useful numbers for X, such as 0. I must be setting up the LCD for A, B, and C incorrectly. When plugging in 0, I get A=-1, which my homework program is telling me is incorrect.

This is what I got after multiplying through with the LCD:

4x^2-1=A(x+1)(x+1)^2 + B(x)(x+1)^2 + C(x)(x+1)

After multiplying all of those out, and attempting to plug in 0 for x, I get A=-1, which as I've stated is incorrect according to my online course.

Am I setting this up incorrectly? Is my LCD incorrect when multiplying through?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Also, shouldn't the RHS of the equation look like this?

A/(2x) + B/(x+1) + C(x+1)^2

As that is all of the terms of the denominator on the LHS?
 
xxwinexx said:
Also, shouldn't the RHS of the equation look like this?

A/(2x) + B/(x+1) + C(x+1)^2

As that is all of the terms of the denominator on the LHS?

Make that A/(2x) + B/(x+1) + C/(x+1)^2
 
Mark44 said:
Make that A/(2x) + B/(x+1) + C/(x+1)^2

OK, so now that I know that it was a misprint, should I set up the equation like this?

4x^(2) - 1 = A(x+1)(x+1)^(2) + B(2x)(x+1)^(2) + C(2x)(x+1)
 
Not quite, the aim of this is to equate denominators across the equality, so you want A,B and C to have the same denominator as the LHS. Then, the denominators can be disregarded for the next part, finding A,B and C.
 
xxwinexx said:
OK, so now that I know that it was a misprint, should I set up the equation like this?

4x^(2) - 1 = A(x+1)(x+1)^(2) + B(2x)(x+1)^(2) + C(2x)(x+1)

You multiplied both sides of the original equation by 2x(x + 1)2. The left side is correct, but the right side isn't. For example, when you multiply A/(2x) by 2x(x + 1)2, you should get A(x + 1)2, not A(x + 1)3 as you show. In each of the three multiplications, you'll get some cancellation.

Try again, but be more careful.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K