Partial Fraction Decomposition

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around solving the integral of the function [x/(x^4 + 1)]dx using partial fraction decomposition (PFD). Participants explore various methods for factorizing the denominator, which is not immediately apparent as factorable.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asserts that the expression is not factorable and seeks guidance on using PFD specifically.
  • Another participant claims that the expression is indeed factorable, suggesting the use of complex numbers as a helpful tool in the factorization process.
  • A different participant proposes completing the square as a method to approach the problem but acknowledges the challenge of determining the necessary adjustments.
  • Further elaboration on completing the square is provided, including a step-by-step breakdown of how to derive equations to find constants needed for factorization.
  • Another participant agrees that completing the square could simplify the problem and provides a rewritten form of the expression to facilitate this method.
  • One participant inquires about the factorization process, indicating a need for clarification.
  • Responses include reminders to review previous posts for guidance on the factorization approach.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the best method to factor the expression, with some advocating for complex numbers and others for completing the square. There is no consensus on a single approach, and the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the need for specific constants to be determined in the factorization process, indicating that multiple equations must be solved. The discussion reflects varying levels of familiarity with the techniques proposed.

jmedina94
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
My professor asks us to solve the integral of:

[x/(x^4 + 1)]dx

This expression is not factorable; what should I do? She is asking us to solve specifically using PFD, not u-substitution.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It most certainly is factorable!
Are you acquainted with complex numbers? (they can be extremely handy on an intermediate step in the factorization procedure)
 
The only method I thought of doing would be to complete the square.
 
jmedina94 said:
The only method I thought of doing would be to complete the square.
The problem with that is, as I'm sure you've noticed, you don't know what to add or subtract. Agreed?

So, we'll proceed differently:
1. ALL polynomials can be factored, with factors being polynomials of degree 2 or less.
2. Thus, the following equation MUST have a solution, for ALL x:
(x^{2}+ax+b)*(x^2+cx+d)=x^{4}+1 (**)
where a,b,c and d are constants to be determined somehow.
3. Now, precisely HOW can a,b,c and d be determined? We'll basically need 4 equations to do so!
Those four equations are gained as follows:
When you multiply together the polynomials on your left hand side LHS of (**), you'll get a term (a+c)*x^3
But, your RHS does NOT contain any terms of power x^3,
thus we must have a+c=0

Similarly, you'll get a term multiplied with x^2, the coefficient of that one must be zero also, by the above argument.

You also must have zero equal to the factor multiplied with x, yielding your third equation.
But finally, multiplying b*d, we see from the RHS in (**) that it must equal 1, that is your fourth and final equation to determine a,b,c and d must be b*d=1
------------------
4. Now, set up all the four equations I have indicated to you; you may try to solve them (it's not that difficult, actually!), or return for more help!

5. Have you understood what you are to do, and why this is a constructive approach?
 
I'm sorry!

OF COURSE you can solve this simpler by completing the square!

Rewrite this as:
(x^{4}+2x^{2}+1)-(\sqrt{2}x)^{2}
Now, you first write the first parenthesis as a square; then use the identity a^2-b^2=(a+b)(a-b) in order to complete factorization.
 
How could I factor it?
 
Have you read post 5?
 
arildno said:
Have you read post 5?

I'm sorry, I'm on my mobile phone :-) thank you, I am reading it right now and will post back with an answer.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K