"Partial Fractions" Decomposition Integrals

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the concept of partial fraction decomposition for integrals, specifically addressing the integral ∫ 1 / [(x+7)(x^2+4)] dx. The user initially breaks the fraction into two parts but struggles with the second part involving B / (x^2 + 4). It is clarified that the numerator should be a polynomial of one degree lower than the denominator, leading to the suggestion to use Bx + C instead of just B. This adjustment allows for a more general representation of the numerator, accommodating all possibilities. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly assuming the form of the numerator in partial fraction decomposition.
DameLight
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I was just introduced to this concept and I have solved a few problems, but I haven't come across any with denominators to a raised power yet.

∫ 1 / [(x+7)(x^2+4)] dx

I would appreciate any directed help.

1. from the initial state I have broken the fraction into two assuming that (x+7)(x^2+4) is the common denominator where A and B are unknown.

∫ A / (x+7) + B / (x^2+4)

B / (x^2+4) has me confused

as I said before, I have not come across denominators to a raised power before and understand that the numerator needs to be raised to one power less, but what this looks like I don't know.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The first part of your PF decomp, A / (x + 7), is OK. For the second part, B / (x2 + 4), you should assume the numerator is a polynomial one-degree lower than the denominator, which is why you assume A / (x + 7).

For the second part, instead of just B in the numerator, what should you assume?
 
SteamKing said:
what should you assume?

Bx + B + 1?
 
DameLight said:
Bx + B + 1?

And why would you assume this?
 
SteamKing said:
And why would you assume this?

because the polynomial on the bottom is in degrees of x so B ( x + 1 ) is better?
 
DameLight said:
because the polynomial on the bottom is in degrees of x so B ( x + 1 ) is better?
You're assuming that the coefficient of x and the constant will be the same. That's a bad assumption.
Make the numerator the more general Bx + C to cover all possibilities.
 
  • Like
Likes DameLight

ah I see now thank you for your help : )
 
"In degrees of x"? Surely you meant to say "second degree in x"!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
993
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K