Particle in an infinite potential box- expected values of energy

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the expected values of energy for a particle in an infinite potential box, specifically using the wavefunction ##\psi(x)=\sqrt{\frac{8}{3a}}sin^2(\frac{\pi x}{a})##. Participants calculated the expected kinetic energy as ##=\frac{\hbar^2}{2ma^2}## and compared it to the ground state energy levels. They also explored the probabilities of finding the particle in the ground and first excited states, emphasizing the need to calculate coefficients ##c_n## using integrals of the wavefunction and energy eigenstates. The discussion highlighted the importance of correctly interpreting the wavefunction and its relation to energy eigenstates.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics, particularly the infinite square well model.
  • Familiarity with wavefunctions and their normalization.
  • Knowledge of expectation values and uncertainty principles in quantum mechanics.
  • Ability to perform integrals involving trigonometric functions and their properties.
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn about the derivation of energy eigenstates in the infinite square well potential.
  • Study the concept of probability amplitudes and how to calculate them using wavefunctions.
  • Explore the relationship between momentum operators and wavefunctions in quantum mechanics.
  • Investigate the implications of the uncertainty principle in quantum systems.
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum mechanics, particularly those studying wavefunctions, energy levels, and the behavior of particles in potential wells.

Rorshach
Messages
135
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I think this is a very easy problem, I will try to show you guys what I tried to come up with:
A particle is in an infinite potential box and is described in a certain moment of the normalized wavefunction ##\psi(x)=\sqrt{\frac{8}{3a}}sin^2(\frac{\pi x}{a})## for (0<x<a) and 0 otherwise.
a) Calculate the expected value of the energy. Compare with the ordinary (stationary) energy levels.
b) What is the probability of finding the particle in the ground state and the first excited state?
c) Determine <p> and Δp by leveraging development coefficients (no integrals to be solved).


Homework Equations


##ΔxΔp≥\frac{\hbar}{2}##
##Δx=\frac{a}{2}##
##<E_kin>=\frac{(Δp_x)^2}{2m}##

The Attempt at a Solution


Ok, so if I understood everything correctly, estimating the value goes like this:
##p_x=\frac{\hbar}{2} \frac{2}{a}=\frac{\hbar}{a}##
##<E_kin>=\frac{(Δp_x)^2}{2m}=\frac{\hbar^2}{2ma^2}##
and comparison with first state: ##\frac{\pi^2 \hbar^2}{2ma^2}>\frac{\hbar^2}{2ma^2}##
as for the probability of those levels- I thought I am supposed to calculate the integral
##\int_{-\frac{a}{2}}^{+\frac{a}{2}}\psi^*_0 (x)\psi(x)\,dx##, but now I don't know. What do you guys think?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello.

What does ##p_x## represent and how did you get a value for it? You want to find the expectation value of the energy: ##<E> = \frac{<p^2>}{2m}##, so you need ##<p^2>##.

Check the limits on your integral in the last line of your post.

[Edit: Also, I don't think ##\Delta x = a/2##]
 
##p_x## represents the momentum of the particle, and I got it from solving the uncertainty equation ##ΔxΔp=\frac{\hbar}{2}##, where ##Δx## comes from the equation i found in a book for problems with infinite potential well- it was supposed to be width of the well divided by 2. Also, I checked the formula for the expectation value of the energy, but in the book it is ##<E>=\frac{(Δp)^2}{2m}##. I am not sure about the correctness of the ground level probability integral, or the limits of it.
 
Remember you are given limits 0<x<a. A quick read through of chapter 2.2 of Griffiths Introduction to Quantum Mechanics will help enormously with this problem. To solve part (b) you first calculate c_{n}=∫ψ_{n}(x)^{*}ψ(x)dx. The probability that a measurement of the energy would yield the value E_{n} is |c_{n}|^2. Also, listen to TSny to solve part (a), the equation you've given is, although true in this case because <p>=0, in general not true.
 
Rorshach said:
##p_x## represents the momentum of the particle,

The momentum of the particle does not have a definite value, so you cannot write down a value for it.

and I got it from solving the uncertainty equation ##ΔxΔp=\frac{\hbar}{2}##,

Here, Δp represents the uncertainty in momentum, not the momentum itself. Δp is usually defined as

##\Delta p = \sqrt{<\hat{p}^2> - <\hat{p}>^2}## where ##\hat{p}## is the momentum operator.

... ##Δx## comes from the equation i found in a book for problems with infinite potential well- it was supposed to be width of the well divided by 2.

Like Δp, Δx is the uncertainty in x and is defined by ##\Delta x = \sqrt{<x^2> - <x>^2}## and generally does not equal a/2. When you looked up Δx in a book, for what quantum state was the book considering? Maybe what you found was a value for <x> for one of the energy eigenstates. Anyway, you will not need Δx or the uncertainty principle for this problem.

Also, I checked the formula for the expectation value of the energy, but in the book it is ##<E>=\frac{(Δp)^2}{2m}##.

The generally correct expression for the infinite well is ##<E>=\frac{<\hat{p}^2>}{2m}##. If ##<\hat{p}^2>## happens to equal ##(Δp)^2##, then what you wrote is ok. But you would need to show ##<\hat{p}^2> = (Δp)^2##

I am not sure about the correctness of the ground level probability integral, or the limits of it.

The expression for the integral is correct except for the limits. Note that the potential well extends from x = 0 to x = a. The integral gives the probability amplitude, not the probability.
 
Last edited:
Rorshach said:
It should be equal to ##\frac{a}{\hbar}##, but it isn't. What is wrong?

Remember ΔxΔp ≥ h-bar/2, it doesn't have to be equal - and usually is not!
 
Rorshach said:
I tried to calculate ##<p^2>## by integration,
Your integration looks correct. From that result you can get <E>.

but I get different result from the one I obtained by solving Heisenberg's uncertainty equation
Why do you want to use Heisenberg's uncertainty relation which deals with uncertainties (Δx and Δp) rather than expectation values?

It should be equal to ##\frac{a}{\hbar}##, but it isn't. What is wrong?

What should be equal to ##\frac{a}{\hbar}##? This quantity has dimensions of the inverse of momentum.
 
  • #10
The result I obtained for energy is weird, I am not sure if it is correct: ##\frac{2\pi^2\hbar^2}{3a^2 m}##. Not sure if it supposed to be like this...
 
  • #11
Rorshach said:
The result I obtained for energy is weird, I am not sure if it is correct: ##\frac{2\pi^2\hbar^2}{3a^2 m}##. Not sure if it supposed to be like this...

Looks perfectly reasonable. Why do you think its 'weird'?

Edit: The source of confusion may be that the wavefunction you are considering is not an energy eigenstate of the ISW.
 
Last edited:
  • #12
I was just expecting something with ##2ma^2## in the denominator and natural number in the nominator, like in the formula ##E_n=\frac{n^2 \pi^2 \hbar^2}{2ma^2}##
 
  • #13
but why can't I obtain ##a## free value for probability of the energies?
 
  • #14
Rorshach said:
I was just expecting something with ##2ma^2## in the denominator and natural number in the nominator, like in the formula ##E_n=\frac{n^2 \pi^2 \hbar^2}{2ma^2}##

Read the edit to my last post. This form is true for energy eigenstates of the infinite square well ψ(x)=√\frac{2}{L}sin(k_{n}x). The wavefunction given to you in the problem is not of this form.
 
  • #15
Rorshach said:
I am not sure if it is correct: ##\frac{2\pi^2\hbar^2}{3a^2 m}##. Not sure if it supposed to be like this...

I believe that's the correct answer. As tannerbk noted, you should not expect the answer to correspond to one of the energy eigenstates because your wavefunction is not an energy eigenstate.

But you can see that your answer is just 4/3 times the ground state energy.
 
  • #16
ok, but I still have the problem with the probabilities- what do I do wrong?
 
  • #17
  • #18
Rorshach said:
ok, but I still have the problem with the probabilities- what do I do wrong?

What have you done? Read my first post (post 4). Calculate c_{n} for the ground state and first excited state. My notation was bad in that post, remember you must use both the wavefunction given to you in the problem and the energy eigenstates.
 
  • #19
Those stupid typos... thanks for the notice:) Is it okay that for the ground state the probability is equal to 1 and for the first excited state it is equal to 4/9?
 
  • #20
No, the sum over all the individual probablities should equal 1. Show your work and we can help.
 
  • #22
You are still confused about what wavefunctions you need to integrate over. Your integral should be the wavefunction given to you multiplied by the energy eigenstate, c_{n} = ∫√\frac{8}{3a}sin^{2}(\frac{{\pi}x}{a})√\frac{2}{a}sin(\frac{n{\pi}x}{a}). For n=1 this will give you the probability that a measurement of the energy would yield E_{1}. You need to calculate this for c_{1} and c_{2}. Again, I suggest you read Chapter 2 in Griffths Introduction to Quantum Mechanics.
 
  • #23
ok, value for the first integral-ground level came out as 0.98014, which squared is equal to more or less 0.96, the second one first excited level is equal to zero. Is this correct now?
 
  • #24
I think those values are correct. Good.
 
  • #25
great! Now it is the last part of this task- so far I can only think of the equation ##\Delta p=\sqrt{<p^2>-<p>^2}##, but then again it is said that no integral is supposed to be solved, and ##<p^2>## came out of the integral... however I am not sure if I understand the term "development coefficients"...
 
  • #26
I believe they want you to use c_{1} and c_{2} to calculate &lt;p&gt; and use that to calculate Δp, since you have already calculated &lt;p^{2}&gt;. Hint: &lt;H&gt;=Ʃ|c_{n}|^{2}E_{n} would be an analogous formula to calculate the expecation value of the energy.
 
  • #27
should it look like this? ##<p^2>=\Sigma |c_n|^2 (-\hbar^2)##?
 
  • #28
Anybody?
 
  • #29
could someone please point me in the right direction?
 
  • #30
I decided to refresh one of my problems, since I still don't know how to calculate the values without integrals. Any suggestions how should I approach this?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K