Particle in Spherical Well : Sudden Approximation

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a particle in a spherical potential well, specifically examining the effects of a sudden change in the well's radius on the particle's quantum state. The discussion centers around the sudden approximation and its implications for the probability of finding the particle in various quantum states after the radius is altered.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the normalization of wave functions and the distinction between probability amplitude and probability. There are inquiries about the implications of changing the radius on the normalization constant and the transition amplitudes to different quantum states.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on correcting expressions and normalization factors. There is an ongoing exploration of the transition amplitudes, particularly for odd and even quantum numbers, with specific attention to the case of n=2. Multiple interpretations of the results are being considered, and participants are working through the mathematical details.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of correctly applying the sudden approximation and the potential divergence of certain sums. There is also mention of specific cases needing special treatment, particularly regarding the transition amplitudes for even quantum numbers.

Xyius
Messages
501
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement



In a spherical well in which..

V=<br /> \begin{cases}<br /> 0,\text{for }0 \le r &lt; R \\<br /> ∞, \text{for } r &gt; R<br /> \end{cases}<br />

the s-wave eigenstates are

\phi_n(r)=\frac{A}{r}\sin\left( \frac{n\pi r}{R} \right)

where A is a normalization constant. If a particle is in the ground state and R suddenly
increases to ##R'=R/\epsilon##, where ##0 \le \epsilon \le 1##

(i) Compute and plot the probability of finding the particle in the new ground state as a
function of ##\epsilon##.
(ii) Compute and plot the probability of finding the particle in a new state with quantum
number n as a function of ##\epsilon## and n (this will be a 3D plot). What are the most important
features you see in your plot?
(iii) Sum all probabilities in (ii) for = 1=2 to show that they add to 1.
Note: The relations

\sum_{n=0}^{∞}\frac{1}{(2n+1)^2}=\frac{\pi^2}{8}

\sum_{n=0}^{∞}\frac{1}{(2n+3)^2(2n-1)^2}=\frac{\pi^2}{64}

may be useful here.

Homework Equations



Obviously the ones given in the problem.

Also, this problem deals with the sudden approximation. Which says that when the system is changed very rapidly, the state remains unchanged initially and then is allowed to evolve.

The Attempt at a Solution



My solution is in the attached images. I know typing it out would have been ideal but it would have been too much and I could give more of my work this way. I scanned them to make sure they were high quality images.

I don't know where my thought process went wrong, but what I am getting for part (iii) is obviously wrong since it diverges at n=2.
 

Attachments

  • IMG.jpg
    IMG.jpg
    19 KB · Views: 501
  • IMG_0001.jpg
    IMG_0001.jpg
    19 KB · Views: 561
  • IMG_0002.jpg
    IMG_0002.jpg
    17.8 KB · Views: 540
Physics news on Phys.org
Generally, your work looks good. But,

(1) Make sure you distinguish between probability amplitude and probability.

(2) When R is switched to R/ε, the normalization constant for the new eigenstates will depend on ε.

(3) It is not true that ##\frac{\sin(n\pi/2)}{n^2-4} = \frac{(-1)^{2n+1}}{n^2-4}##. For example, let n = 4. Also, n = 2 will need special treatment.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Oh I forgot to replace n with 2n+1 in the denominator. After doing this, I get the second form of the second equation listed in the problem, except, It needs to be squared. In other words, I get.. (We will call it P)

P=-\frac{8}{\pi}\frac{(-1)^{2n+1}}{(2n-1)(2n+3)}

So in order to get the summation, I need to first square this, THEN sum over n. I cannot determine if this makes sense or not. That means I am summing up the ##P^2## values, not the ##P## values.
 
Your expression for P is off by an overall numerical factor because you have not normalized the wave functions correctly for the case where the radius of the well is ##R/ \epsilon##.

When you correct for this, you will have expressions for all of the transition amplitudes from the initial state to final states with odd quantum number ##\psi_{2n+1}##. You found that the transition amplitudes to states with even quantum number are zero. But there is an exception: the transition amplitude to ##\psi_2## is not zero.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
I believe I got it. Re-writing the normalization constant, I got a factor of 1/2. Meaning the summation I showed in my previous post is equal to 1/2. I then used l'hospital's rule for when n=2 and got that term to be equal to 1/2. So 1/2+1/2=1.

Hopefully, this is it. Thank you very much for your help!
 
Good.

Another option for handling the n = 2 case is to set up the transition amplitude integral specifically for n = 2 and ##\epsilon = 1/2## and show the integral is ##\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}##. So the probability for this transition is 1/2.
 

Similar threads

Replies
46
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K