Particular Sub y_p into DE for r(x)

Ted123
Messages
428
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Show (by substituting it directly into the differential equation) that

[itex]\displaystyle y_p = y_2 \int \frac{ry_1}{W}\;dx - y_1 \int \frac{ry_2}{W}\;dx[/itex]

is a particular solution of [itex]y'' + p(x)y' + q(x)y = r(x)[/itex].

Homework Equations



[itex]W[/itex] is the Wronskian [itex]y_1 y_2^{\prime} - y_2 y_1^{\prime}[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution



How do I sub [itex]y_p[/itex] into the DE?
 
on Phys.org
Hi Ted :smile:

Just calculate [tex]y_p^{\prime\prime}+p(x)y_p^\prime+q(x)y_p[/tex] and check that it equals r(x)...
 
micromass said:
Hi Ted :smile:

Just calculate [tex]y_p^{\prime\prime}+p(x)y_p^\prime+q(x)y_p[/tex] and check that it equals r(x)...

I can't see how to differentiate [itex]y_p[/itex] and certainly [itex]y_p^{\prime}[/itex] though.

For instance, how do I find:

[itex]\displaystyle \frac{d}{dx} \left( y_2 \int \frac{ry_1}{W}\;dx \right)[/itex] ?

I know

[itex]\frac{d}{dx} \left( \int \frac{ry_1}{W}\;dx \right) = \frac{ry_1}{W}[/itex]

but [itex]y_2[/itex] is a function of x, and it is multiplied by that integral...
 
Ah yes. There, you have to differentiate a product of two functions. So you need to use the product rule:

[tex](fg)^\prime=f^\prime g+fg^\prime[/tex]
 
micromass said:
Ah yes. There, you have to differentiate a product of two functions. So you need to use the product rule:

[tex](fg)^\prime=f^\prime g+fg^\prime[/tex]

I get:

[itex]\displaystyle y_p^{\prime} = y_2^{\prime} \int \frac{ry_1}{W}\;dx - y_1^{\prime} \int \frac{ry_2}{W}\;dx[/itex]

[itex]\displaystyle y_p^{\prime\prime} = y_2^{\prime\prime} \int \frac{ry_1}{W}\;dx - y_1^{\prime\prime} \int \frac{ry_2}{W}\;dx[/itex]

So:

[itex]\displaystyle y_2^{\prime\prime} \int \frac{ry_1}{W}\;dx - y_1^{\prime\prime} \int \frac{ry_2}{W}\;dx + p(x) \left( y_2^{\prime} \int \frac{ry_1}{W}\;dx - y_1^{\prime} \int \frac{ry_2}{W}\;dx \right) + q(x) \left( y_2 \int \frac{ry_1}{W}\;dx - y_1 \int \frac{ry_2}{W}\;dx \right)[/itex]

should equal r but does it?
 
You didn't exactly follow the product rule did you??

You should have done

[tex]\left(y_2\int\frac{ry_1}{W}\right)^\prime=y_2^\prime\int{\frac{ry_1}{W}}+y_2\frac{ry_1}{W}[/tex]

Now, if you differentiate like that, then what is [tex]y_p[/tex] then?
 
micromass said:
You didn't exactly follow the product rule did you??

You should have done

[tex]\left(y_2\int\frac{ry_1}{W}\right)^\prime=y_2^\prime\int{\frac{ry_1}{W}}+y_2\frac{ry_1}{W}[/tex]

Now, if you differentiate like that, then what is [tex]y_p[/tex] then?

I did follow the product rule:

[itex]\displaystyle y_p = y_2 \int \frac{ry_1}{W}\;dx - y_1 \int \frac{ry_2}{W}\;dx[/itex]

so differentiating the first term gives what you have.

Then differentiating the 2nd term [itex]- y_1 \int \frac{ry_2}{W}\;dx[/itex] gives:

[itex]- y_1^{\prime} \int \frac{ry_2}{W}\;dx - \frac{ry_1y_2}{W}[/itex]

so adding the 2 together gives:

[itex]y_p^{\prime} = y_2^\prime\int{\frac{ry_1}{W}\;dx}+\frac{ry_1y_2}{W} - y_1^{\prime} \int \frac{ry_2}{W}\;dx - \frac{ry_1y_2}{W} = y_2^{\prime} \int \frac{ry_1}{W}\;dx - y_1^{\prime} \int \frac{ry_2}{W}\;dx[/itex]
 
Ah, yes, you are correct! :smile:
Now, try to show that the expression equals r(x). Try to do something with the definition of y1 and y2. (How are these things defined anyway?)
 
micromass said:
Ah, yes, you are correct! :smile:
Now, try to show that the expression equals r(x). Try to do something with the definition of y1 and y2. (How are these things defined anyway?)

[itex]y_1(x)[/itex] and [itex]y_2(x)[/itex] are independent solutions of

[itex]y^{\prime\prime} + p(x) y^{\prime} + q(x) y =0[/itex].
 
  • #10
So you can substitute for [tex]y_1''(x)[/tex] in your equation above.

EDIT: even easier, collect terms which have [tex]\int \frac{ry_2}{W}\;\mathrm{d}x[/tex].
 
  • #11
grey_earl said:
So you can substitute for [tex]y_1''(x)[/tex] in your equation above.

EDIT: even easier, collect terms which have [tex]\int \frac{ry_2}{W}\;\mathrm{d}x[/tex].

I'm not entirely sure what you're saying. We want:

[itex]\int \frac{ry_2}{W}\;dx \left( -y_1^{\prime\prime} - py_1^{\prime} - qy_1 \right) + \int \frac{ry_1}{W}\;dx \left( y_2^{\prime\prime} + py_2^{\prime} + qy_2 \right)[/itex]

to equal [itex]r(x)[/itex].

[itex]y_1[/itex] and [itex]y_2[/itex] are linearly independent solutions of [itex]y^{\prime\prime} + py^{\prime} + qy = r[/itex].

If we substitute [itex]y_1^{\prime\prime} = r - py_1^{\prime} - qy_1[/itex] in we get:

[itex]- r \int \frac{ry_2}{W}\;dx + \int \frac{ry_1}{W}\;dx \left( y_2^{\prime\prime} + py_2^{\prime} + qy_2 \right)[/itex]

Doing the same for [itex]y_2^{\prime\prime} = r - py_2^{\prime} - qy_2[/itex] we get:

[itex]- r \int \frac{ry_2}{W}\;dx + r \int \frac{ry_1}{W}\;dx[/itex]
 
  • #12
EDIT:

[itex]y_1[/itex] and [itex]y_2[/itex] are linearly independent solutions of the homogeneous equation [itex]y^{\prime\prime} + py^{\prime} + qy = 0[/itex]. (not the inhomogeneous one as in my last post).

So this would make [itex]-\int \frac{ry_2}{W}\;dx \left( y_1^{\prime\prime} + py_1^{\prime} + qy_1 \right) + \int \frac{ry_1}{W}\;dx \left( y_2^{\prime\prime} + py_2^{\prime} + qy_2 \right)[/itex]

equal 0 which isn't r ...
 
  • #13
Ted123 said:

Homework Statement



Show (by substituting it directly into the differential equation) that

[itex]\displaystyle y_p = y_2 \int \frac{ry_1}{W}\;dx - y_1 \int \frac{ry_2}{W}\;dx[/itex]

is a particular solution of [itex]y'' + p(x)y' + q(x)y = r(x)[/itex].

Homework Equations



[itex]W[/itex] is the Wronskian [itex]y_1 y_2^{\prime} - y_2 y_1^{\prime}[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution



How do I sub [itex]y_p[/itex] into the DE?

Bad notation is getting in your way. You need a different integration variable, so instead of having dx inside the integral you should have, for example, dt; that is, write
[itex]\displaystyle y_p(x) = y_2(x) \int_{a}^{x} \frac{r(t)y_1(t)}{W(t)}\,dt - y_1(x) \int_{a}^{x} \frac{r(t)y_2(t)}{W(t)}\,dt[/itex]
Now you can see that the derivative of the first term is
[itex]\displaystyle y_2'(x) \int_{a}^{x} \frac{r(t)y_1(t)}{W(t)}\,dt + y_2(x) \frac{r(x)y_1(x)}{W(x)} ,[/itex]
etc.

RGV
 
Last edited:
  • #14
Ray Vickson said:
Bad notation is getting in your way. You need a different integration variable, so instead of having dx inside the integral you should have, for example, dt; that is, write
[itex]\displaystyle y_p(x) = y_2(x) \int_{a}^{x} \frac{r(t)y_1(t)}{W(t)}\,dt - y_1(x) \int_{a}^{x} \frac{r(t)y_2(t)}{W(t)}\,dt[/itex]
Now you can see that the derivative of the first term is
[itex]\displaystyle y_2'(x) \int_{a}^{x} \frac{r(t)y_1(t)}{W(t)}\,dt + y_2(x) \frac{r(x)y_1(x)}{W(x)} ,[/itex]
etc.

RGV

Even with different variables, it still leads to this:

[itex]\left( y_2^{\prime\prime} + py_2^{\prime} + qy_2 \right)\int \frac{ry_1}{W}\;dx - \left( y_1^{\prime\prime} + py_1^{\prime} + qy_1 \right)\int \frac{ry_2}{W}\;dx[/itex]

which I need to show equals [itex]r[/itex].

There must be something with those DEs multiplying each integral that means something
 
  • #15
I get the above + r. The coefficients multiplying your two integrals are zero, since y1 and y2 satisfy the homogeneous DE.

RGV
 
  • #16
Ray Vickson said:
I get the above + r. The coefficients multiplying your two integrals are zero, since y1 and y2 satisfy the homogeneous DE.

RGV

Can I ask how you managed to get that +r ?

[itex]\displaystyle y_p^{\prime} = y_2^{\prime} \int \frac{ry_1}{W}\;dx - y_1^{\prime} \int \frac{ry_2}{W}\;dx[/itex]

[itex]\displaystyle y_p^{\prime\prime} = y_2^{\prime\prime} \int \frac{ry_1}{W}\;dx - y_1^{\prime\prime} \int \frac{ry_2}{W}\;dx[/itex]

So subbing these into [itex]y_p^{\prime\prime} + py_p^{\prime} + qy_p[/itex] gives:

[itex]\displaystyle y_2^{\prime\prime} \int \frac{ry_1}{W}\;dx - y_1^{\prime\prime} \int \frac{ry_2}{W}\;dx + p(x) \left( y_2^{\prime} \int \frac{ry_1}{W}\;dx - y_1^{\prime} \int \frac{ry_2}{W}\;dx \right) + q(x) \left( y_2 \int \frac{ry_1}{W}\;dx - y_1 \int \frac{ry_2}{W}\;dx \right)[/itex]

[itex]= \left( y_2^{\prime\prime} + py_2^{\prime} + qy_2 \right)\int \frac{ry_1}{W}\;dx - \left( y_1^{\prime\prime} + py_1^{\prime} + qy_1 \right)\int \frac{ry_2}{W}\;dx[/itex]
 
  • #17
Ted123 said:
Can I ask how you managed to get that +r ?

[itex]\displaystyle y_p^{\prime} = y_2^{\prime} \int \frac{ry_1}{W}\;dx - y_1^{\prime} \int \frac{ry_2}{W}\;dx[/itex]

[itex]\displaystyle y_p^{\prime\prime} = y_2^{\prime\prime} \int \frac{ry_1}{W}\;dx - y_1^{\prime\prime} \int \frac{ry_2}{W}\;dx[/itex]

So subbing these into [itex]y_p^{\prime\prime} + py_p^{\prime} + qy_p[/itex] gives:

[itex]\displaystyle y_2^{\prime\prime} \int \frac{ry_1}{W}\;dx - y_1^{\prime\prime} \int \frac{ry_2}{W}\;dx + p(x) \left( y_2^{\prime} \int \frac{ry_1}{W}\;dx - y_1^{\prime} \int \frac{ry_2}{W}\;dx \right) + q(x) \left( y_2 \int \frac{ry_1}{W}\;dx - y_1 \int \frac{ry_2}{W}\;dx \right)[/itex]

[itex]= \left( y_2^{\prime\prime} + py_2^{\prime} + qy_2 \right)\int \frac{ry_1}{W}\;dx - \left( y_1^{\prime\prime} + py_1^{\prime} + qy_1 \right)\int \frac{ry_2}{W}\;dx[/itex]

You have the wrong [tex]y_p''[/tex]. Remember: [tex]\displaystyle \frac{d}{dx} f(x) \int_{a}^x g(y) \, dy = f'(x) \int_{a}^x g(y) \, dy + f(x) g(x)[/tex]

RGV
 
  • #18
Ray Vickson said:
You have the wrong [tex]y_p''[/tex]. Remember: [tex]\displaystyle \frac{d}{dx} f(x) \int_{a}^x g(y) \, dy = f'(x) \int_{a}^x g(y) \, dy + f(x) g(x)[/tex]

RGV

Of course. The [itex]y_p^{\prime\prime}[/itex] has the +r as the W cancels! (Thanks a lot!)
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K